You might want to look into 5751 tubes instead which offer less gain than the 12ax7. Never heard of subbing a 12at7. Run the 5751 by AR.
Tube subtitutions 12AT7 for 12AX7
My old ARC SP6-B sounds swell with my phono,
but has way too much gain for my CD players.
To get normal volume levels,
I barely adjust the gain past 9 o'clock (3 clicks).
With the stepped gain, this leaves no room for
fine volume adjusments.
I would like to reduce the gain by substituting
the 12AX7 tubes (in the line stage portion only)
for 12AT7's. There is some discussion of this
at www.thetubestore.com, but more from a guitar amp
point of view, than audiophile amps.
Does anyone have any experience with this sort of thing?
Am I gonna wreck the preamp doing this?
but has way too much gain for my CD players.
To get normal volume levels,
I barely adjust the gain past 9 o'clock (3 clicks).
With the stepped gain, this leaves no room for
fine volume adjusments.
I would like to reduce the gain by substituting
the 12AX7 tubes (in the line stage portion only)
for 12AT7's. There is some discussion of this
at www.thetubestore.com, but more from a guitar amp
point of view, than audiophile amps.
Does anyone have any experience with this sort of thing?
Am I gonna wreck the preamp doing this?
- ...
- 9 posts total
I agree with Dekay. Although it is not recommended to substitute a 12AT7 for a 12AX7 a 5751 is simply a special (industrial) type of 12AX7 with lower gain and a slightly higher heater current. Amplification factor of the 12AX7 is 100 where the 5751 is 70. I have both NOS 12AT7 and 5751 tubes in stock if you need them but would not recommend the 12AT7 in this case. |
Hi TJ: A couple thoughts. Its late at night here or is it early in the morning? With guitar amps one of the reasons for the switch is to change tone/sound of the amp too isn't it? I think i remember it, at least in some guitar amps, being called crunchy and/or dirty which is actually sought out by some players for certain kinds of music. Distortion in the circuit is actually considered a good thing. Anyway, to my knowledge the 12AT7 has lower plate resistance and higher transconductance than the 12AX7. I took a quick look at on-line tube data and they are not mentioned as substitutes on the couple sites I visited. You can look here for the plate curves of two makes of the two tubes. They are quite different. plate curves click on the left hand column to find the the info for the 12AX7. In any event, I think you would be changing most of the operating points and likely the sound of your pre in order to change the gain for one source. This might cause more trouble than it solves. Do you like the sound of the pre now? Is the gain about right for your vinyl now? If you decrease the pres overall gain will it still be ok? (You generally want as little gain as possible and still be adequate) I do not know anything about your pre. If you like the sound of it now and the gain in your phono is about right I would maybe attack the gain problem for the cdp alone instead of introducing all sorts of unnecessary changes to the entire system. My guess is that the most direct way to solve a gain problem with a cdp would be to add some resistance in that individual circuit. Maybe as simple as adding a resistance to the interconnect or the OP stage of the cdp. You can install different pads (a pad is just a pair of resistors) on each input jack if you have sources of different sensitivity. Usually simple and inexpensive. Any local DIYer or guitar amp repair place can do it or you. (Depending on the circuit there is a little art in how best to do this because you dont want the added resistance to combine with capacitance/reactance and create a filter.) You might check over at the Audio Asylum forums and see if someone has experience with your pres circuit. I cant tell you what size resistors to use w/o more info and even with more I might still be, well....clueless. Or call the manufacturer and explain the problem. This must be a common problem because the output of phonos and cdps is so wide these days. For most cdps these days lots of people choose passive or nothing at all. I remain, |
Post removed |
Thanks for your advice, guys. Can I ask a few more questions? I'm using Sovtek 12AX7 WXT+ or EH or some marked CZ. If I mix types, I always keep the same types together in the phono section (3 tubes) or line section (3 tubes). The original manual calls for ECC88 tubes, but these really are equivalent to the 12AX7, aren't they? Or would they maybe have less gain, like the 5751? Am I happy with the SP6 sound overall? Hmmmm....I think another reason I was considering a tube swap was the tube rush. I used to listen to tubes back in the 60's and 70's and forgot how "noisy" it can be. OK, it's minimal, but noticeable compared to my passive pre setup. The tube rush does NOT appear in the SP6 line out. Perhaps the SP6 line stage has some other problems with it that can't be corrected with a tube swap? For now, I'm using a passive pre for the CDs and taking the line out (after the phono EQ) from the SP6 for the phono and running it into the passive pre, too. All that into an ARC Classic 30 (no tube rush there, to speak of) and into a pair of Quad ESLs (original 57s). |
- 9 posts total