I like to simplify the ACTIVE VS PASSIVE (or dirrect source to amp) scenario like this:
...with out being technical, it's usually like the difference between a HONDA Civic that can over rev it's engine and RPMs while going 120mph, vs a Turbo Porche that has much more snap,torque, overall power, response, and performance at the same 120mph!!!
In the case of most passive set ups(or no-preamp set ups), sure you can get the overall volume level up. But what seems to happen is a lack of overall dynamic control and body to the sound, which an Active preamp set up can overcome by proper amplification of it's signal! Even weaker amplifiers with higher wattage ratings can push the volume level higher, but it's also flat and 2 dimmenstional, and strained as well! (i.e, cheap reveiver amps). I'm also not so sure that just having PROPER IMPEDANCE MATCHING is the key. I think you can still get a good impedence matcy between CD player and amp, and still not get the dynamics you would from a properly designed active preamp! Hum....
Also, for the record, I've talked to PLENTY of aduio engineers and speaker/equipment designers over the years, and they often think things are a matter of simple mathematical and physics equasions! What I find is that usally these are the guys that don't have the best sound from their systems also! There's an old saying.."if it ain't broke, don't fix it!" And the quality active preamp works for all practical purposes!
Anyway, I've yet to hear even the expensive Wadia's sound as good dirrect to an amp, as they do with a good preamp infront of it! That's what I find anyway. And I've heard a lot of passive set ups!...a lot!
THE ONLY way you'll find out the differnce, is to try both, experiment, and then you'll know!
good luck