Reference DACS: An overall perspective


There has been many threads the last few months regarding the sonic signature of some of the highest regarded reference DACS (Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) here on the GON. I have been very fortunate to audtion many of these wonderful pieces in my home or friend's systems. I wanted to share, in a systematic way, my impressions/opinions with you GON members for a two reasons: 1)That my experiences might be helpful to fellow members interested in audtioning these DACS. 2)Starting an interesting discussion regarding the different "sonic flavors" of these reference digital front ends. I totally agree with the statement, "if you have not heard it you don't have an opinion". Therefore, I have no comments regarding DACS from Weiss,Goldmund,Audio Aero and Burmester because I have never had the pleasure of audtioning them. I would love to hear from members who have and share their experiences with us. My overall impression is that these DACS(Dcs,Meitner,Ensemble,Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts) can be grouped into two molar categories regarding their overall sonic signature. By the way, all of them can throw a large/deep soundstage with excellent layering in the acoustic space with "air" around individual players on that stage. However, than they start to part company into two major categories. Category #1) These DACS "flavors" revolve around pristine clarity, fine sharp details,speed,very extended top/bottom frequencies,and great PRAT. These DACS never sound "etched" or "in your face" but are more "upfront" then "layed back" in their presentation. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Dcs,Ensemble,Meitner. My personnal favorite in this group is the Ensemble, which I owned for two years. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Wilson,Thiel,Dynaudio, Focal/JM Labs. Category #2) These DACS "flavors" revolve around a "musical/organic" sense, natural timbres,and an easy flowing liquidity. Their "less forward" presentation my give the impression of less detail, but I think in this case its an illusion fostered by their more relaxed/organic manner. The DACS, to my ear's, that go into this bracket are Audio Note,Zanden,Reimyo,Accustic Arts. I did find that the tube DACS did not have the top/bottom frequency extenstion and PRAT of the SS DACS in this bracket. For me, the Accustic Arts DAC1-MK3 gave me the best of both categories, therefore it is now the resident DAC in my system. These DACS remind me of the sonic signature of speakers such as Magnepan,Von Schweikert,Sonus Faber. Well, it's all just my opinion regarding these digital pieces, but I hope this post was at least informative/somewhat interesting and would lend itself to other GON members sharing their impressions, not about what DAC is the "BEST" in the world, but your personnal taste and synergy with your system.
teajay
Exlibris, besides that I always take a very skeptical view of all reviews, I would agree with what Branimir stated and add the following two points: 1) Without coming across as an audiophile "snob" I don't have to much respect for Potis' overall system, not just the DACS he uses, but the rest of his gear. I'm not a fan of either of his speakers or the cables/wires he uses. 2) I find the theoretical explanations of way a hard drive might offer a more pure, less jitter, signal then a laser based transport very interesting, but I think its much to soon to decide that its a superior strategy right now. So, I believe I'm still open minded but I would have to hear/audition a hard drive in my own system before I would jump on that bandwagon. I'm still looking forward to your "field report" on the Sextet, hope your still enjoying it.
Branimir,
I certainly don't believe everything I read; including what I read in Stereophile and TAS. I'm not familiar with John Potis. Do you find the reviews on 6moons and PF to be less objective than those in Stereophile and TAS? I take them all with an equal grain of salt.
I'm trying to keep an open mind about hard-drive audio.
Here's the bottom line: the engineer's original digital audio tape sounds so much better than the CDs that are produced from it. I have to believe that there is a higher-quality way to play back digitally recorded music than spinning optical discs made of plastic. To be honest, with high-end CD playback I think we are all trying to make silk purses from sows' ears.
I am using a Dodson 218 for conversion in a hard-drive based system. I find it oveall a very well balanced, very analog sounding, DAC. Not sure where it fits in the molar categories that organized the beginning of this thread but I think it fits in the league of reference DAC's.
Pardales,
What transport did you own prior to going with the hard-drive system?
In my, very limited, experience there is something to be gained by ripping a CD but there are also some things that get lost:
1. low-level ambient detail and venue cues
2. an organic and natural presentation of space is often replaced by an amorphous sense of space, a 'black void.'
Personally I am too interested in a hard drive source in addition, not as a replacement to my Meitner front end. Its less audio quaility driven but rather motivated by convenience in terms of data storage and flexibility such playlists. Having said that it has taken quite a long time for regular redbook technology to get to where it is now....as such I think its best to wait for awhile to see if we get more competition from the mfrs in this area then figure things out.