I think where we are seeing things different is in the presence part of our descriptions because we both agree that triode provides the most realistic rendering of the music.
For my system and ears the triode mode conveys much more detail and recorded room ambience, more direct palpable presence of the instruments than in tetrode (small group, preferably acoustic based music is forming the basis of this comment). Listening to Keb mo i feel that i could walk around him while listening to triode, not so defined in tetrode. For me tetrode tends to provide the wash of sound that you attribute to triode, though it tends to have more body/fullness, just not as pinned down and accurate..the slightly off clone that you describe.
Seeing that we agree on a number of our observations my guess is that the way our speakers (and rooms) deal with the different modes (and resulting drop in available power in triode) may play a significant part in our differences
For my system and ears the triode mode conveys much more detail and recorded room ambience, more direct palpable presence of the instruments than in tetrode (small group, preferably acoustic based music is forming the basis of this comment). Listening to Keb mo i feel that i could walk around him while listening to triode, not so defined in tetrode. For me tetrode tends to provide the wash of sound that you attribute to triode, though it tends to have more body/fullness, just not as pinned down and accurate..the slightly off clone that you describe.
Seeing that we agree on a number of our observations my guess is that the way our speakers (and rooms) deal with the different modes (and resulting drop in available power in triode) may play a significant part in our differences