Eldartford: I was prompted to do further research by this question of tetrode vs. pentode catagorization. What I noticed is that beam-tetrodes, lacking the suppressor screen of a true pentode, but with the beam-forming plates (which are not electrically-connected elements of the tube, otherwise known as electrodes) between the cathode, grid, and screen on the emission side and the anode (plate) on the collection side, are nevertheless often described as pentodes or 'beam-pentodes' - even in their original manufacturer's
technical description papers. This finding, though I don't know the explanation for it, does help me understand why I've seen certain popular audio output tubes variously refered to as both tetrodes and pentodes in magazine reviews and the like. (Here is
a page showing helpful diagrams of the differences.)
I also had forgotten that the British "KT" designation in fact stands for Kinkless Tetrode (duh!) - in other words, beam design. So obviously my KT-88EH's do not have an unused electrode element when run in tetrode in my VTLs, and the same would go for 6550's. Further confusing matters (for me) was the fact that my previous tubed audio amplifier used EL-34's (a true pentode) but ran them in ultralinear connection. The RCA 6L6 was apparently the first production beam-tetrode - see
this link for the backstory. Though both suppressor screens and beam-formation plates are intended to deal with secondary emission from the anode, it does seem likely to me, as possibly alluded to in the article I linked in my post of 12/7, that the two constructions might behave somewhat differently when triode-connected.