Help: my phono preamp is blowing away my linestage


I recently was fortunate enough to acquire an Aesthetix Io Signature phono stage that has taken my system to a whole new level. But now I fear that my old Rogue 99 Magnum linestage is holding back the full capabilities of the Io.

I can't afford to buy an Aesthetix Callisto or Calypso, and indeed I spend most of my time listening to vinyl (but perhaps I'd listen to more CDs if I had a better linestage).

I figure I can spend up to about $2500 on a better linestage. Can I improve on the Rogue for this sum?

Patrick
patrickamory
I've been considering the Bent Audio Noh passive volume control (based on S&B TX-102 transformers), but I've heard that passives are much less dynamic than active preamps. Also I do want to rediscover my CDs again, and I'm thinking a passive might be OK with the Io but not so great directly from my CDP.
Plato: Parasound, huh? No 2000s available right now, but I see the PLD-1500, also a John Curl design. Is it comparable?

Patrick
Since you have a great phono stage, how about a Supratek line stage only. New should right about on target to your budget. Used you would be able to stay under if you can fine one used.
"...but I've heard that passives are much less dynamic than active preamps..."

Where do these strange "rumors" come from? Preamp manufacturers??

The absolute BEST, ANY preamp can do, is leave the signal unadulterated, while only acting as a "wire with gain".

I owned several "big gun" ($8 - $10k) preamps before finally going with a passive preamp with my BAT P10 phono stage. It was BY FAR much more transparent, with NO loss of dynamics or "headroom".

Patrick, if your looking for the purest, cleanest signal possible (unless you can afford a $10k preamp) at least TRY a passive pre with your set up.

The only possible downside will be one of gain (as in not enough of) depending on the cartridge and phono stage output used.

Good luck!