time to discuss kt-88's

Yes, 400 hrs for a tube to burn in IS rediculas, but I have experienced rediculasly long burn in periods in other areas.
I did call upscale to ask about this, and they more or less confirmed this, saying about 300 hrs, and that they have an "unusally" long burn in.
My assesment of the svetlanas is not nessesarily different, but in the quicks, what I heard was definitely a very 'clear' midrange, in fact, was able to pick up a lot of the harsh, buzziness that a real trumpet or saxaphone sounds like. Synergy is sometimes matching strenghts and weaknesses, and sometimes it is just a unique situation. It is worthwhile to note or discuss what tubes work well in what amp, and of coarse while assesing a tube the amp it is in must be considered, but there are still differences in tubes and brands that make them stand out or just be so-so. It is interesting that the svetlana, that seems to have such a glorious midrange and soft and soggy highs and lows would not balance out in an arc, but this could be telling, too.
The kt-90's ARE changing to me, which I will comment on later, and I should also note that in my experience, the quicksilvers to me are not amps that have long burn in periods with different tubes or long warm-up times.
I will continue to burn these tubes in and report back soon.

Kevziek- I tend to agree with you with just about any tube... a good 15 to 40 hours and they are good to go. The Ei KT-90 Type III is the ONLY exception I have had in over a decade of tube rolling. I thought I was being fed a line when I was told 400 hours, and like I posted above I was ready to throw the tubes out at about 380 hours. However, with the money invested and the time, I pushed on past 400+. Let me state again, the transformation was NOT subtle. THE transformation appeared about 410 hours or so... everything improved, and when using electrostats it was very clear what changed, air, openness, transparency, transients, etc.

Again, I too would agree that this sounds totally crazy and would think it is nothing but bull$hit, until of course I went through it myself...

I wouldn't want to have tubes that take over 400 hours to burn. Based on an estimated useful life of 1,500 hrs., 1/3 of the tubes' useful life will be gone before it is burned in.

Yea, I'm burning the hell out of these kt90's. I have logged about 70 hrs since fri. I have left them on non-stop except for about 3 hrs today to let them cool, and recheck the bias as I fired them back up, so I could kinda keep my eye on things. (btw, yea, 400 hrs IS a pain in the butt, but then again, this is fun).
So, I have to report, because these are turning into some nice tubes for me. They ARE changing, and a lot of what I am hearing is pretty accurate to audiofankj's description.
Now, first off, it is true that getting used to, or accustomed to, is relevant. It is also relevant to have such a detailed description of what to look for, while it may seem that I am being swayed by such, I am LISTENING and I am sure of what I am hearing. (extraordinary claims should require extraordinary proof).
The bass has really opened up, and goes deeper than I have ever heard through these amps. But more important, it is very 3-d AND solid. The bass sounded tight before, but what has really changed is that there is much more detail in this regard, both in the staging qualities and the perception that there is now a lot more information being reproduced.
The treble, while I could desribe as less hashy, really hasn't changed changed in overall timbre or character except to say that it appears to be having the same effect as the bass-that is, there seems to be more separation between different treble frequencies.
What is really different about the sound of these tubes from what they sounded like before as they burn in is in the detail, like they have suddenly and astonishingly became able to resolve textures and harmonics that they could not before. While perhaps the staging qualities may be the same, the extra detail with the instruments is giving space to them, and one thing that is definitely different is that now, an individual note or voice now has a depth, and is reproduced with an individual dimension, where before it was flat, which helps with the effect that the staging is better overall. It also seems that the bass, and the fact that it definitely has MUCH more dimension and definition, is integrating to really give the midrange realism.
What really seems noteworthy to me is the way these tubes focus, as the sounds that are coming out of my humble vandy 2ci's is really pinpoint, And the images are definitly 'there'. What is presented by the speakers has a very solid place in the room. Each instrument or voice sounds like it is at a very specific place that is easy to make out. While the chinese kt-88's presented everything wider and deeper, With greater separtion between sounds, The greater detail of the kt-90s and the 'precision' of the effect has its own effect on the overall picture.
That's all for now, as I feel I am struggling to describe this. In short, what I am definitly hearing is a lot more detail coming from these tubes now, and it is having an effect on the meaning, the impact, on what these tubes sound like.

Kevziek - If I am not mistaken, many would argue the KT-90's are built like a tank and I believe I have been told their useful life is 4-6K hours if biased normally. In my past experience I had well over 4,000 hours on my set and the tubes were showing no signs of wear. On my current set with my new amps they are just shy of 400 hours... :)