Thanks guys! very helpful.
Here is another multi-channel amp with similar spec, but it looks like it's not as good(effective) as NAD I guess
POWER OUTPUT (Anthem PVA 7)
# of Channels Driven --------- 1 ----- all(7) -------
Power rating ----------------- 125 --- 100 -------
http://www.anthemav.com/NewSitev2.0/AnthemProduct/PVASeries/PVASpecs/PVASeriesSpecs.html
It means
when listening to movie(5 or 7 channels) = 100W/ch
and when listening to music(2 channels) = little less than 125W/ch.
Only 25% increase, compare to 40% increase for NAD for 2 channel applicaton.
So, whatever their design method, I geuss that NAD amp is better deal in terms of 2 channel application?
I thought it's very natural to provide the 2 channel only power rating, but surprisingly not many provide it like NAD and Anthem.
NAD is known to be very conservative and honest in their power ratings, and I guess it fits my need well, so I'll probably get it after reading some more reveiws and auditioning.
Here is another multi-channel amp with similar spec, but it looks like it's not as good(effective) as NAD I guess
POWER OUTPUT (Anthem PVA 7)
# of Channels Driven --------- 1 ----- all(7) -------
Power rating ----------------- 125 --- 100 -------
http://www.anthemav.com/NewSitev2.0/AnthemProduct/PVASeries/PVASpecs/PVASeriesSpecs.html
It means
when listening to movie(5 or 7 channels) = 100W/ch
and when listening to music(2 channels) = little less than 125W/ch.
Only 25% increase, compare to 40% increase for NAD for 2 channel applicaton.
So, whatever their design method, I geuss that NAD amp is better deal in terms of 2 channel application?
I thought it's very natural to provide the 2 channel only power rating, but surprisingly not many provide it like NAD and Anthem.
NAD is known to be very conservative and honest in their power ratings, and I guess it fits my need well, so I'll probably get it after reading some more reveiws and auditioning.