2. amps-preamps
  3. 1100746075

ultimate final word 3 on best passive preamp

attenuator volume control top of the line #1 winner incredible fantastic deal of the century world class a. i have started a series here and included all these words to help newbies find this thread, this is so that someone new or not so new can make this the last stop before buying a passive volume control. can those who have experience with this area share with others what passive volume control is their choice and why and also which have been a disappointment thanks these are the ones i found so far i am not endorsing any just listing what is available and by the way some of these are available as kits to be soldered some are assembled, here they are: placette, machand, goldpoint, michael percy, evs ric shultz, transcendent, bent. please don't respond if you have nothing positive to contribute i welcome criticism if it's constructive but to those snobs who can only afford kharmas god bless your little soul and hey let's all agree on something "life like" does not replace the concert hall or the live performance "life like" means similiar and not exactly the same. for those who lack awareness we all know that the speaker will not replace the real thing but we are all here trying to get closer to it.
pedrillo
sutts
700 posts
 
I tried the Bent- while I enjoyed the mids/highs, I found ti lacking in bass depth, and went bac to a much superior active unit...
nighthawk
259 posts
 
Pedrillo, you said you welcome constructive criticism, so here it is. Your message would be easier to read and understand if you would capitalize the first letter of each sentence and the letter "I" when your refer to yourself. I understand if English is not your first language that you may not appreciate the importance of this. Please, do not take offense. This is friendly advice.
sdatch
204 posts
 
I have had the opportunity to use a Placette Passive in my own system (which has evolved since purchasing it) and trying it out in vastly different system. The 2 considerations listed by Jameswei above are right on, and are of great importance when deciding whether or not to use a passive preamp / attenuator. I have found that, at least in the case of the Placette, a high gain source and a friendly (>= 100 kOhm) load at the amplifier are key, especially in the absence of impedance management circuitry and any sort of buffering (which I think would be the purist definition of a passive). In my system, which is very friendly for the Placette, the passive has been magic. In a less "friendly" system (lower output digital source and < 30 kOhm load) the results were not good. In fact, we noticed a roll off of the highs, less stable images, and rolled off bass. Thus, based on my experience I would certainly place the Placette near the top of the list, with the caveat that current system components need to be taken into consideration.
mejames
986 posts
 
Placette is absolutely astonishing
dre_j
159 posts
 
I owned the Placette Passive Linestage. I enjoyed using it in my system and would still have it but I needed to make a change. Back to the Placette Passive, It sounds wonderful with a good source. If the source is bright, the sound will be bright, if the system is warm, the sound will be warm. I truly feel it is giving the user what the source gives it. This is the best praise I can give the Placette Passive Linestage.

BTW: I still own a Placette. ItÂ’s no longer passive.

Hope this helps
More to discover