manufacturing is now a myth. consolidation in the music industry has caused the labels to manufacture their discs in fewer plants and export to various territories. several years ago the source material was also different in different countries. the japanese were the first to upgrade the source material, and today catalogue and new releases are the primarily the same, no matter who the label is. the additional cost to the consumer for the mini-lp is the packaging, and the cost of additional royalties if there are additional music tracks. as a collector, its still worth it,but the reality today is the the source and the manufacturing standards are the same in the u.s.,u.k.,and japan.
Hearsay, Rumor, Myth or Fact?
Last week I ordered a cd by Lee Morgan called "Charisma" on Blue Note Records from CD Connection. Their database listed a $10 domestic cd and a $25 imported cd...same music label.
I received the $10 cd yesterday. I played it last night and it was thoroughly enjoyable. What do you get for the extra $15 on the imported version?
I was told by a wise old sage and fellow jazz fanatic back in the '70's that imported lp's from Japan were of superior quality than the domestic stuff. Normally in record stores back then, when you saw the Japanese version of an lp, it was generally at least twice the cost of the domestic version.
Has anyone here found this superiority claim to be true? Can anyone cite any specific examples of recordings that they have compared side by side that supports the import superiority claim?
If true, is it generally found that certain record labels sound better on the imported version...or is it generally true across the board?
Or, is it true in just jazz recordings?
Or, is this something that audiophiles do to spend more money to psychologically fool themselves that their system will sound better if the imported recording costs more money than the domestic version?
It would seem a shame for an audiophile to spend $10-50K+ on a system, and then feel like he's cutting corners when confronted with these two choices when purchasing music. I would rather not spend more than twice as much for a piece of music just for peace of mind that I've gotten the best if it's just hearsay, rumor or myth.
I received the $10 cd yesterday. I played it last night and it was thoroughly enjoyable. What do you get for the extra $15 on the imported version?
I was told by a wise old sage and fellow jazz fanatic back in the '70's that imported lp's from Japan were of superior quality than the domestic stuff. Normally in record stores back then, when you saw the Japanese version of an lp, it was generally at least twice the cost of the domestic version.
Has anyone here found this superiority claim to be true? Can anyone cite any specific examples of recordings that they have compared side by side that supports the import superiority claim?
If true, is it generally found that certain record labels sound better on the imported version...or is it generally true across the board?
Or, is it true in just jazz recordings?
Or, is this something that audiophiles do to spend more money to psychologically fool themselves that their system will sound better if the imported recording costs more money than the domestic version?
It would seem a shame for an audiophile to spend $10-50K+ on a system, and then feel like he's cutting corners when confronted with these two choices when purchasing music. I would rather not spend more than twice as much for a piece of music just for peace of mind that I've gotten the best if it's just hearsay, rumor or myth.
- ...
- 12 posts total
- 12 posts total