H2O Signature Stereo vs H20 Signature Mono Amps

As far as I last heard:

S-250 - $2,500

S-250 Sig. - $2,800 ? first I heard was here (not sure)

M-250 - $4,000

M-250 Sig. - $5,500

I would assume Henry quoted you correctly and perhaps Muralman had a typo above...

Barrelchief

In what way are you downsizing your rig?

The H20 stereo versions have about 1/2 the capacitor storage bank of the monos. That said, the stereo H20s still have more storage than many other amps - in excess of 70,000 uF per channel.

Could this extra storage capacity be wasted in your downsized system?

The stereo Signature model is essentially dual mono in a single chassis. It employs a separate transformer for each channel.

Bob

Between family & work, I do not have a lot of time to just kick back & enjoy my music these days. Therefore, I am trying to put together a 2-channel system that is musically satifying to my ears, but does not tie up the cash that I had in Rowland's 302 and Synergy IIi.

Tough to justify this level of gear, when some of that $ could serve so well in other areas of our home.

The challenge is on, as you can see what reference amplification my ears are accustommed to.

Game on. I will take odds on that Barrelchief as I was auditioning the Rowland 201's, 501's, and the 302 (heard it, wasn't in my price range) with the Synergy IIi before I stumbled upon the H2o's.

With that said, the Rowland 201's and 501's didn't compare to the 302 (obviously) and neither did the 201's or 501's compare to the H2o standard stereo IMHO. FWIW I think the 201's sounded better in the mids than the 501's, however the 501's did appear to have better control. The 302 is a different animal than either the 201 or 501. I was told by a Rowland rep that the 201 is 85-90% of the sound of the 302. I will have to respectfully disagree. However, perhaps the refinement, etc. is in that last 10-15%... it just didn't sound that close to me.

I would contact Henry and see if he has a *broken in* pair of Signature Mono's you can audition. Make sure he is aware you want a broken in pair, as I can tell you now, the sound change is drastic between a new unit and one fully broken in, especially in the mids being fleshed out and liquid as well as the air on the top end.

I haven't had the pleasure to compare the Sig H2o Monos to the 302, however if my memory serves me correct, and there is no impedance mismatch between the Synergy IIi preamp and the H2o's I think you will be pleasantly suprised.

Are you also looking to downsize on your preamp, as that is a very good preamp...

Hi Audiofankj:

I appreciate you sharing your experience.

I would describe as my "downsizing" as being in the "big picture" and not necessarily with every component...just looking to pull out a good chunk of $ and maintain an enjoyable 2-channel system.

Yes, the Synergy IIi is a very nice pre. However, with these changes, I am very interested in matching up a tube pre with SS power amp. One pre that has been recommended to sound great w/Ice amps (after rolling tubes) is the Aesthetix Callypso. I am open to suggestions.

Thanks!