Do I have to buy all new CDs?


OK, I know the question is fecetious, But I ffel like my collection of over 300 CDs went down to about 10 that still seem worth listening to. I am new to the audiophile game, so I started with Martin Logan SL-3s and a Sunfire amp. I guess I just didn't believe how revealing they really would be. I should have guessed when I immediately realized the differences in recording quality on the two Clapton CDs I use to audition speakers. This thread has become a complaint. For future reference is there any way to identify high quality recordings before I buy?
wsmatau
Wsmatau- Pre-amp should help dramatically, but would also second the thought that CDs mastering/re-mastering has improved dramatically. Especially with older rock titles. You might want to consider a monthly replacement program as you find re-masters. And then you can probably get $5 each used, so it shouldn't be a major $ drain.
I use the Mcintosh C42 preamp with my Martin Logan Ascents. I also alternate a MC 352 amp and a EAR tube amp for different presentations and fun. The eq adjustments on the 42 are a godsend for different recordings and room variations. Check it out. It is really versatile and extremely quiet .
kubuli...I'm afraid that is true to a degree. It sounds like we listen to the same types of music. I fell in love with the Martin Logans and didn't heed a lot of warnings about their difficulty in placement and inability to rock and roll. I think that is largely overblown. What they are is incredibly transparent, and a lot of mainstream music isn't recorded as well as classical and jazz recordings. If you are looking to upgrade I might shy away from the ESLs if you listen primarily to rock and blues, unless you have the time and money to invest in all of your components.