onhwy61, it's been my experience that in a well-assembled system, nearly every positive system improvement is significant and substantial and rather easily acheived.
I believe that would seem logical and I'll demonstrate by using the following analogy:
If I were racing an old jalopy that had an out-of-round wheel, I might not even know that the wheel is inferior even at top speed. But if I were racing a finely tuned Indy car and I had an out-of-round wheel, I'd probably recognize a problem before I reached 10 mph.
And if I'm racing that Indy car at 220 mph but corrected the deformed wheel, that car's performance improvement should be rather significant and substantial in comparison.
In other words, a well-assembled system as you put it, should have fewer and smaller bottlenecks/governors.
But properly addressing just one of those fewer and smaller bottlenecks can be akin to completely removing a govenor.
Whereas a poorly assembled system with so many governors, properly addressing just one usually makes little or no difference.
That is why I believe so many people try a new product or tweak, don't notice any improvements, and then make sport of those that do notice a difference as if they've bought into a snake oil (of course snake oil products can and do exist).
As for your issue with dangling cables being susceptable to air-borne vibrations? I'm not that familiar with the issue but I realize that it is a potential area of concern.
Nevertheless, by it's constructive nature and shape, a cable should be less susceptible to air-borne vibrations than a larger square boxed component that may have minimal internal bracing, as well as a cable not having a motor, spindle, transistors, capacitors, power supplies, etc..
Though a cable's reaction to vibration is still potentially valid, I don't think it's quite to the same degree.
And again, on that truly well-assembled system, properly addressing vibrations within the cables could make a rather significan and substantial difference.
-IMO
I believe that would seem logical and I'll demonstrate by using the following analogy:
If I were racing an old jalopy that had an out-of-round wheel, I might not even know that the wheel is inferior even at top speed. But if I were racing a finely tuned Indy car and I had an out-of-round wheel, I'd probably recognize a problem before I reached 10 mph.
And if I'm racing that Indy car at 220 mph but corrected the deformed wheel, that car's performance improvement should be rather significant and substantial in comparison.
In other words, a well-assembled system as you put it, should have fewer and smaller bottlenecks/governors.
But properly addressing just one of those fewer and smaller bottlenecks can be akin to completely removing a govenor.
Whereas a poorly assembled system with so many governors, properly addressing just one usually makes little or no difference.
That is why I believe so many people try a new product or tweak, don't notice any improvements, and then make sport of those that do notice a difference as if they've bought into a snake oil (of course snake oil products can and do exist).
As for your issue with dangling cables being susceptable to air-borne vibrations? I'm not that familiar with the issue but I realize that it is a potential area of concern.
Nevertheless, by it's constructive nature and shape, a cable should be less susceptible to air-borne vibrations than a larger square boxed component that may have minimal internal bracing, as well as a cable not having a motor, spindle, transistors, capacitors, power supplies, etc..
Though a cable's reaction to vibration is still potentially valid, I don't think it's quite to the same degree.
And again, on that truly well-assembled system, properly addressing vibrations within the cables could make a rather significan and substantial difference.
-IMO