Joe_Coherent, I certainly will not retract those, and instead demand a more suitable apology from you. And you don't want to mess with me either, I can benchpress 320 pounds.
Hey Jerko, (C-eber), fighting and benchpressing have nothing to do with each other. I see your ideas on that topic are as incoherent as those on CD-Rs and regular CDs. I'm thinking I may want to do an A-B comparison with you on both.
I'm thinking you don't. Like hell they don't, you wouldn't want to get a punch from me...You will soon be gone from here, for the name calling, anyway. I'm sure it is YOU who will (or are already) using different aliases, so you'll never be gone from here completely, I guess. Maybe you'll just have a heart attack, or something...
Please explain to us all, in your own words, why CD-Rs sound worse than the originals if (i) there are no errors in the copying process, and (ii) the information is stored in a digital (i.e. discrete) format. Unless you dispute (i) or (ii) in which case also kindly please explain.
Carl Eber is correct in many ways. He is right about digital copies not being as good as the original. Think about this. If they were exactly the same, then ALL cd players and transports would sound the same too. Jitter is a big problem on computer CD-rs. Errors are also aplenty on copies. They show up like dither.. Carl is also correct about Joe Coherents character. He was kicked out of audioasylum for using multiple names and spamming others. His system soesn't sound like its capable of revealing the flaws in CD-r copies. All of the above is true. Carl, don't get all worked up over his comments. He is not worth the effort.
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
