Who's the Cadillac of Hi-End Audio?


In "Get Shorty" John Travolta's character arrives in Los Angeles and the only car available at the rental agency is a minivan. Throughout the film people question why he's driving such an "uncool" vehicle and his character's response is "It's the Cadillac of minivans." By the end of the film everybody is driving the Cadillac of minivans.

Being that cars and hi-end audio have absolutely nothing to do with each other, notwithstanding so called hi-end auto systems, what company do you think is the Cadillac of hi-end audio? What's the Porsche? What's the Dodge Dart? Is any hi-end company as quirky as Saab? For that matter, what's the Harley-Davidson of hi-end audio?

My vote for the Cadillac goes to McIntosh. Both are old school companies with proud histories. Yet each offers products that while not cutting edge, are quite modern. Still, there are no documented cases of anyone under the age of 50 having purchased either brand within the last 30 years.

Except for my answer there are no wrong or right answer responses. Use you imagination and freely express your biases and preconceived notions.
onhwy61
PBB I have had several VW/Audi's over the last twenty years and reliability has never been an issue. I currently have a Passat and have never had a problem with it. I have owned and driven several German cars including Audi and Mercedes that rode like a dream at any speed and I tested their ability to go fast! They did everything I demanded with aplomb. As long as ride and speed are not an issue, buy all the Japanese cars you want. Quality is obviously not an issue to you, in automobiles or stereo equipment.

German iron and steel has been known for generations to be the best available. Other countries try to emulate it's quality by adding to, or subtracting from what they are able to mine.

Japan does not have a good source for high quality iron or steel.

I spent a week driving a Jaguar last spring and was quite impressed with the quality of the ride and the construction. It is far and away better than my Passat which is better than any Japanese car I have ever driven. I must admit that I gave up on Japanese cars many years ago. I would never consider owning one when all the German/British/Swedish/Italian cars are better made and more reliable. I doubt though that you would be able to recognize the qualitative differences, based on what you have already said, so what' the point...
It's good to know that the second largest economy in the world doesn't have a good source of steel, but then again in my original post I did ask for people to freely express their biases.
If I had to guess what was the most reliable automobile made, I would guess either Toyota or Honda.

This based what I have read and heard over several years, plus my personal experience of having owned one Toyota and six Honda's.

I have also owned seven Volkswagen's, including the new Beetle with water cooled engine. Volkswagen, Toyota and Honda are VERY different in style, personality and finish. All are excellent in their own way, but I do have a special spot in my heart for German cars.

When I bought my first Honda in 1978, American Automobiles were not very well made and fuel inefficient at a time when we had gas shortages. Buying a Honda also made sense because of EXTREME value. A new Civic with AM-FM radio, air conditioning, and sport wheels could be purchased for $3800.00 new off the showroom floor.

This low price setting trend continued until about 1986, until they begin to get overly popular, causing the price to rise to within a few thousand dollars of the Volvo 740 Turbo wagon (and the Volvo had sunroof, drop forged allow wheels and leather).

Later, after Volvo evolved to 100% front wheel drive, dropped their no fault / no cost, bumper to bumper warranty and was gobbled up by Ford, the unique personality and low prices vanished completely.

Right now, American SUV's and trucks from both GM and Ford have rebates, incentives and zero percent interest, making them the best deal in decades. My new GMC retailed for over 40K, and I am driving it for $326.00 a month with no money due at the end of 36 month lease.

Considering I cannot spend a dime on repair during the time I drive it, that is not bad overall operating expense.

Surprisingly, the slow economy has also hit extreme luxury cars. A ultra high end 745 BMW was just leased by of my friends at $750.00 a month on two year basis.

He paid ZERO down, not even tax. He gets a free BMW X5 as a loan car when he gets his oil changed, and if he's busy, the dealership will pick his car up and drive him where he needs to go.

Granted it's a LOT of money, and WAY over my budget, but for the guy that can afford that kind of luxury, that is an incredible way to drive a $75,000.00 automobile and not have to be responsible for it long term.

As I said before, this is all about what you want, need and can afford. I would have a stable of automobiles including a BMW 6 series coupe and the new Aston Martin DB 9 if I had Bill Gates money :^).
I stand by my original comments which labeled Japanese cars as a whole unexciting - I also cited their high build and design quality (and by association reliability). My main objection to the Japanese cars is that in driving them I feel like the design philosophy was prescribed by a focus group rather than an engineer. By this I mean the Japanese cars try to offend nobody (with the exception of a few sporting models such as the RX-8). Drive a German car such as a BMW, Audi, or Mercedes and the car feels like it was carved out of a single piece of metal and has an angular purpose.

Excitement in my view has little to do with cost or even quality of design (although I do cite the quality of Japanese design and build). I've driven an Acura RL and Lexus LS430 and ES300 and been bored to death while the comparitavely crude Miata is a blast by comparison. I believe that for similar reasons we are instructed to let our friends demo the music they like on our systems and not a technically perfect audiophile disc.

I do agree with the generalization that German cars are more expensive to operate than Japanese cars. I chalk this up to higher performance requirements and more intense operating conditions. This quite simply requires a more intensive upkeep program regardless of how the owner drives. Anyone familiar with aviation can attest to this.

Having said all this - I (a college engineering student) currently drive a 1995 Civic owned by my uncle since new. I got this car on the basis that it was supposed to be reliable and cheap to operate. So far this has held true.

My previous car was both more reliable, cheaper to operate, and performed better... it was a 1987 Audi 4000S - bought new by my dad for his business travel.
A number of people have mentioned how certain cars offer a certain excitement when driven. Is this driving excitement analogous to what some audiophiles call musicality? There may not be a logical connection, but the language people are using is so similar.

For what it's worth, I drive an 1998 Audi A8 and my previous ride was a 1993 Lexus SC300. They're very different cars and each has its strong points, but one thing is an absolute fact. The Lexus dealer network is far superior to Audi's and this definitely effects the total ownership experience.