Should there only be one company making gear?


Since there are such strong feelings regarding audio gear, with one company being right while the others are wrong, would it be easier on our psyche if there were only one company?

For example, one person might love Krell gear while another prefers the Rouge 88. Rather than the two of them fighting or disagreeing about the merits or shortcomings of the other, wouldn't it be easier/better if these conflicts did not exist?

Is it possible that there will ever be a piece of gear on which all audiophiles could agree?
nrchy
Boner pills? NOW this thread is getting interesting!
Look what you did Nrchy!!
Think about it; If there were no boners, would AIDS be the epedimic that
it is? I don't think so. I'm not saying H.T. Boner and his family are at
fault, not at all. I do feel sorry for H.T. Boner's children...the 'little'
boners. I guess H.T. was a little boner once himself. Now H.T.'s boner
is the reason there are more little Boners suffering the torments of their
classmates ridicule. If I were H.T. I would have cut it off at the source
and not subjected more children to suffering the legacy of being a little
Boner. And then, later in life, just a "Boner". A man can get
that fixed you know. The elder Boner could just get the damn thing
snipped inside and take the clams outta' his man chowder so they don't
go makin' no more lil' Boner's with the missus. That, or I'd have legally
changed my name to something less provocative...like Bush perhaps.

Marco
Jax2....follow the AudiogoN rules.
Rule number 3498.78B "Stick to the subject matter" gottcha!! :~)
BTW..real funny post..those poor boners :~(
Ah, I don't think I got that far in the rulebook. I'll have to bone-up on my Agon etiquette I guess. It's thick...that rulebook. And its hard...to remember all those rules.

Marco

PS...I think you meant to write; "...those poor Boners", and NOT "...those poor boners"