2. misc-audio
  3. 1089322416

Should there only be one company making gear?

Since there are such strong feelings regarding audio gear, with one company being right while the others are wrong, would it be easier on our psyche if there were only one company?

For example, one person might love Krell gear while another prefers the Rouge 88. Rather than the two of them fighting or disagreeing about the merits or shortcomings of the other, wouldn't it be easier/better if these conflicts did not exist?

Is it possible that there will ever be a piece of gear on which all audiophiles could agree?
nrchy
jax2
3,031 posts
 
Ah, I don't think I got that far in the rulebook. I'll have to bone-up on my Agon etiquette I guess. It's thick...that rulebook. And its hard...to remember all those rules.

Marco

PS...I think you meant to write; "...those poor Boners", and NOT "...those poor boners"
david99's avatar
david99
1,467 posts
 
Jax-Nah,I got it right.
Those poor boners (on the Boners) I meant.:<)

Isnt the rule book number 4569.90z read "all posts are to be made in a mature manner"?
Gosh,this is some thread!
david99's avatar
david99
1,467 posts
 
Jax-Nah,I got it right.
Those poor boners (on the Boners) I meant..:<)

Isnt the rule book number 4569.90z read "all posts are to be made in a mature manner"?
Gosh,this is some thread.
david99's avatar
david99
1,467 posts
 
woops,looks like I pulled a boner!
seandtaylor99
1,262 posts
 
Nrchy ... I'm truly sorry for what I did to your thread. A quick jibe at historical reenactments, a follow up with the b*n*r word, and now the thread is lost at sea.
More to discover