Comments on Thiel CS2.2 speakers

It's really a parallel move to a different flavor. Have you not heard the 2.2s? They're very different from the 2CIs. The Vandersteens are warmer and more forgiving of moderate components upstream. The Thiels will provide more detail, possibly tighter sounding bass, but at the expense that they will be brighter with more emphasis on the highs than the Vandys, and they will expose more of the limitations of your associated gear.
If you've heard 'em and like em, then go ahead. If you're rolling the dice, I'd be leary unless you really want to go in that direction. Cheers,
Spencer

Tom,
Having owned both, I dont think I'd give up my 2Ci so quickly for the 2.2. More of a lateral move, and just different sound. The 2.2 will have more detail and resolution, but are also leaner and somewhat more Vivid in their presentation( some may read "bright"..but it depends on the associated equipment.) The 2.2's are best with darker sound SS and tubes amps IMO. If you like the 2ci's how about looking at the 2CE sigs? :)

Depends on your taste. I have never been able to "warm up" (pun intended) to Vandersteen. I started with Thiel CS2, then 2.2 and now CS2.3 and have always checked out the leading contenders before going back to Thiel. They do seem bright on some recordings but I find those CDs tend to sound bright on most fairly neutral transducers. Whenever I get the itch for something new, as I do now, I listen around and always give the Vandy's a chance. The latest iteration of the 2s sounds much better but still not my cup of tea. Too smooth and lacking in detail. However, Vandy owners most likely think the Thiels to bright. If you really like detail and precision, go Thiel. Soft and fuzzy, check out the 2Ci. Perhaps a different move is in order, give the Gallo Reference 3s a listen. So far, they are the best of the new bunch I have heard, but still feel mine (and the Thiel CS2.4) are much better.

Tim McTeague