2. amps-preamps
  3. 1368417143

Why do some audiophiles beat up McIntosh?

I've been around audio my entire life. I'm 45 and I bought a decent Technics system when I was 12 with my paper route money. Genesis speakers built in New England which were actually pretty darned good. I would spin vinyl every single day to the point it drive my parents crazy. My buddies father had a McIntosh system that I was in love with and he was allowed to play it. It was haunting for me to hear his fathers system.

Fast forward 28 years later and I'm perplexed at the hatred I see posted online about McIntosh. Is it really that bad or is everyone upset that McIntosh is so successful? It doesn't make sense to me that the resale value is the best in the business yet audiophiles bash them. I personally have always loved their gear and sound. I don't own any, and probably never will. Still, I just don't get it. I've always admired McIntosh. Looks aside, I always enjoyed the music. Can someone tell me that they're junk or do you just not like the presentation?
donjr
wolf_garcia
6,711 posts
 
The description of selling Mac stuff to doctors and lawyers back in the day seems perfect...note again that with every manufacturer (of nearly anything) that's been around that long there's great stuff, and some not so great stuff, and so what? I dig their tube amps and they've received rave reviews recently, so I'm confidant the doctors and lawyers are hearing something sweet.
ces4x4
16 posts
 
I've owned Mac equipment, darn stuff looks awesome IMHO. Wish I had kept my c220, glad I got rid of my MA6300. Have had a hard time finding one of their power amps I like listening to, sure hope I do though, love those blue eyes!!
loomisjohnson
1,949 posts
 
i think an underlying principle of all snobbery is that if something (whether it's audio, wine or movies) is very popular, it can't be very good. i also suspect that many have an innate bias against gear which emphasizes aesthetics and form--perhaps we feel that we're paying a super-premium for looks as opposed to performance. all that said, i think some of the above criticisms of the lower-end mac amps and integrateds is valid--i hear a bit of graininess. however, it's inarguable that their stuff is extremely well-built, looks great and is virtually unmatched in terms of collectibility and resale value.
pops
2,275 posts
 
@Audiolabyrinth, bose and Mcintosh same sentence...really, been there done that....sure you have....and your in a new league now...really and because someone has more dough plowed into a system its better.....you will learn....one day. Just not into equipment slamming...put your system on virtual so I can learn.
magnumpi205
504 posts
 
Mac get gear has always been at the top of the audiophile brand recognition heep. That makes it the preeminent target even though there is better gear out there, those brands don't have the name recognition that Mac has. It is tough to say your brand is better than a brand no one has heard of.
Mac gear is still a great value at the time of sale and holds it's value as well as any brand.
Still dream fondly of my Mac 240s hooked to a Marantz 7c eminating from a Dual 1219 playing on my Chartwell LS/35as!
More to discover