certin speaker makers harder to get dissounts fro


I have gotten a lot of good info here in the past few days, my new question is . The Martin logan dealers i have talked with said they never discount, but they are on sale( the vantage) for $60 off per speaker. Is this true for others who have bought ML speakers you could not get a price break even when spending a far amout of money. If it seems like i harp on money plese for give me im am but a Parmedic and it has taken me some time to put together 11000 dollars. Looking at some of the systems here that may be your cable budget. I dont wish you ill if if can afford this type of gear, I just wish I could also. Maybe one day, and it is fun to dream
cj1capp
I don't know how many times I have to type the same thing Krelldog...I never said I ONLY buy used. I said I have bought used. I mentioned I bought a NAD CD and amp at a local dealer...I've also bought accessories from them as well...I just don't waste their time with outlandish discounts

I never said there's anything WRONG wtih asking for a reasonable discount...I said the 30% and over get's a little out of hand, these are high end dealers not Best Buy's moving clearance...their business is service first, not discounts. And in regards of getting people in the gate, yes its important, but In the world of hi-end anything, its more important in keeping them. This is done through service rather then pricing. Much like a car salesman working for BMW or a person selling Rolex watches.
Cj1capp:

Caveat emptor! After all, the dealer doesn't have to listen to you daily for 10 years, but you have live with your system. Nobody has the stake that you do in investing your hard-earned money.

I have recently bought a system and have learned a big lesson: if you buy new from a dealer, MAKE SURE IT IS THE RIGHT THING FOR YOU! Things don't sound the same when you get them home. If you buy something new, and try to return it, you will get pushed into keeping it until it "breaks in", as in "Oh, yeah, those speakers need 200 hours before you should listen to them". So if after a month or so you still find it's not what you want for your $10,000, what will you do? You can sell it used, and take a 20% loss (or more), or you can return it to your dealer, who will also charge you a restocking fee of 20%. So with a new $10000 purchase, you will lose $2000 just by taking that equipment home.

Whereas if you buy something used, you get a chance to realy try it out. If it turns out not to be the right thing, you can sell it and probably not lose too much.

I support buying from dealers, and do it when I can. But just try returning a $10000 item to a dealer and see what happens.

Good luck with your negotiations
I must be one of the lucky ones. My dealer lets me home audition anything in his store than doesn't weigh more than a small car. I can go in his store and listen for a full day 10am to 6pm and he doesn't bother me for one minute unless I ask him too. On top of
that he gives me 20%
off on new equipment and up to 35% off on current demos. BTW- He carries all the top brands that you can't get discounts at the other stores. Is this guy going out business, Hell no he is one of the highest volume dealers in the state and I don't live in Kansas.(no offense to Kansas people I'm just trying to make a point) He lives in a multi-million dollar house and drives a car that cost a third as much as my house and I don't live in a shack. Meanwhile the other dealers have turned down my business because I asked for a discount. In the last year 2 of those dealers have closed there shops and the 3rd one just sold his business.
Lush, I can assure, to no end, that people are not buying Rolex because of their service. When it can take 12 weeks for service work to be done.
Cjlcapp, you have clearly touched a nerve! I have wrestled with the ideas at the core of your question for some time. The answer for you will be of course be your own, but it's encouraging to see such differing points offered for consideration. In fact, the emotion displayed in this thread shows that we take this seriously.

On that thought, I offer my own view. Lush, I agree with you. Krelldog, I disagree but I see where you are coming from.

The litmus test for me is found through intention. If your intention is to buy from a brick and mortar, then taking their resources is potentially an equitable transaction. If, however, your intention is to take their resources without buying, you have in fact stolen.

This is obviously a moral thing, and I don't pretend to take the high road easily. Anyone else have the same view?