I suppose Ditusa thinks we all owe it to him to agree with whatever he says.....sorry to let him down.
- ...
- 31 posts total
Ditusa made a claim that defies what many of us assume. Some of us, however, are aware that the claim is not unreasonable. Whether or not he is correct remains to be seen but just rejecting his comments without a substantial argument to the contrary is certainly unreasonable. Chadnliz - You seem to disagree with his assertion. Why? |
Best 2-way as in.. Biggest-Baddest-Loudest? How about a definite contender for "Best 2-way that can compete with a big bad three way for farfield use?" (seeing as a three ways main advantage over a two way is broad even dispersion and generally a higher acoustical ouput - granted it comes with the disadvantage of an additional x-over) This type design lives on without the Dolly Parton look. And yes - something like this is very big and very bad - with a transient response like a panel and ability to play at a max peak of 136 db SPL - there is very little out there that will play percussion as realistically as this will. Anyway I'd like to stay away from "best" - for sure a 2 way is better in most nearfield applications and a bigger three way is generally better in most farfield applications (with noted certain exceptions in either direction) |
Unfortunately for audiofeil I seem to have infringed upon the items he feels sell the most and I apologize if I have affected your profit margin. As far as Chandnliz, I do not feel as though anyone owes me their unanimous agreement. However it seems as though most of the forum does. In light of Audiofeil's highly intelligent response to my former comment: >>I have a pair of 4430 and a pair of 4435 JBL studio monitors. The best two way speakers on the planet That's funny!!<< Well in that case im glad I gave you a good laugh. |
- 31 posts total