B&W 802d Room Placement

I use about twice that for my 802Ds but I think that side wall relationships are more significantly related to toe-in as is speaker to listener distance.

Kal

I think that side wall relationships are more significantly
related to toe-in as is speaker to listener distance.

That is an indisputable fact. However, it can be minimized by designing a
speaker with an off axis response that is wide with even dispersion and matches the on axis response very precisely in the shape of the response curve. A speaker that does this is more likely to sound the same over a larger area or sweetspot. This is because the response that you hear remains consistent at the majority of angles and the reflected sound field matches the primary sound field.

The B&W N805 horizontal dispersion plot is a good example. Note the relatively
small midrange scoop off axis (for a two way it ain't bad) and note how very consistent (in shape) is the behaviour of the off-axis response.

The B&W 802D can be compared to the above link I gave for the N805 above.

To compare - see the lateral response plot here.

Note the "scoop" is deeper than the N805 (because the tweeter is crossed over much higher - probably to allow greater dynamics withiout audio compression) - this will make the 802D more sensitive to toe-in and side wall placement than the N805 (as off axis response is more variable). Of course the 802D will blow the N805 out of the water in terms of realistic dynamics, no compression and awesome bass response - no constest there as the 802D is an outstanding speaker...