2. amps-preamps
  3. 1429816937

New system/room, upgrade amp or preamp first?

Hi all! This is my first post here but I've been an active A'gon'er for many years.

I recently built myself a listening room in the basement. Nothing too exotic in terms of the actual room construction, but I do have 4 OC703 acoustic panels on the wall for front wall reflections and for first reflections. I had a friend build cabinets and I did the crossovers and assembly of Troels Graven's ScanSpeak 3-way Discovery monitors. Just got them done yesterday, they sound very good but need a while to break-in.

I am currently using Jriver set to DoP, out via USB to a Schiit Loki DAC, then on to a Marantz SR-685 5.1 receiver acting as a preamp, and finally on to a B&K AV5000 5.1 separate amp (5 x 105), obviously only using two of those channels. I have the sub out of the Marantz y'd and connecting to two BIC F12's, used only to fill in the lowend. They aren't the most musical subs obviously but they do a fine job to my ears for 45-50Hz and below. They provide a satisfying weight to the sound without dominating the room.

So, I'm pretty OK with the DAC and source. I'm basically using two repurposed home theater components so those are next on my list to upgrade. The room is small, 13 x 10 (speakers are 82" apart, my chair is 82" back from the center point, about 3' from the back wall). I have kicked around an integrated amp but I do prefer separates if I'm being honest. If I have a $1500 budget for ONE component, what should I be looking at first - addressing the AVR-turned-preamp, or the B&K amplifier? The item not chosen for upgrade at this point will be addressed in another 2-3 months.

It's tough to judge a system with such new speakers but so far, the sound is well-dimensioned for both width and depth, though depth is a bit shallow. Voicing is wonderful, thanks in part to the 4" ScanSpeak midrange (wired out of phase with the woofer and tweet).

My listening tastes are varied but primarily I prefer Rock, Metal, and am starting to get more into blues and jazz. I do some orchestral stuff here and there as well as instrumental concerts (violins and piano). Any and all opinions are welcome, I can clarify whatever is necessary. Thanks!
toddrhodes
akg_ca's avatar
akg_ca
2,335 posts
 
your pre-amp first ..... full stop

the receiver, particularly as a preamp, is your weak link
mapman's avatar
mapman
22,636 posts
 
In that small room, the amp is probably fine for now.

If you must change one or the other sounds like the pre-amp is the one to change first.

Its hard to find any Bel Canto pre-amp in good working condition for much less than $1000 so the price seems fair off the cuff, assuming all else is in order.

Its worth checking Audiogon Blue Book on most items when you need to know what prices are reasonable based on prior similar sales. You might be able to justify offering less depending but $1000 does not seem out of the ballpark to start.

FWIW I am a BC fan. It's one of the lines I track regularly. I have Bel Canto amps but not pre-amp, though I might someday.
toddrhodes OP
49 posts
 
I appreciate the feedback! I had considered going to the BlueBook to check it out, I just may do that. Thanks again!
toddrhodes OP
49 posts
 
I've initiated contact with the seller. I just can't find a bad word about this thing unless it's being compared to units several times its price. It checks all the boxes, BlueBook reveals it is priced well... I believe it shall have a new home soon.

Todd
almarg's avatar
almarg
9,670 posts
 
I agree with the many suggestions of preamp first, not on philosophical grounds related to the importance of preamps generally, but because the AVR appears to be the weak link in this case.

I took a look at the possibility of impedance incompatibilities arising with the various replacements that have been suggested, given the 33K input impedance of your power amp and the 75 ohm output impedance of the DAC, and I don't see any likely issues, even with the passive Lightspeed.
04-24-15: Toddrhodes
There is a Bel Canto Pre1 for sale locally that I am very intrigued by; unfortunately I do need a remote based on where the preamp will sit, and this seems to be a very good Pre that allows for both sub hookup and remote control.
I took a look at some rear panel photos of the Pre1, and I don't see that it provides a suitable means of connecting to your sub. Even if that's the case, though, your subs provide speaker level inputs which you could use, connecting them to the amp outputs. That shouldn't be a problem given that it does not appear that the B&K amp's outputs are bridged or balanced. But when you eventually upgrade the amp, you'll want to keep in mind that with that connection arrangement you should avoid choosing a new amp having outputs which they are bridged or balanced. The negative output terminals of bridged or balanced amps have signals on them, rather than being grounded, and connection to those outputs of the high level inputs of a powered sub could short those signals to ground, depending on the design of the particular sub.

Keep in mind, also, that you don't need heavy gauge speaker wire to connect the power amp outputs to the subs, since essentially negligible current will be drawn by the input impedance of the amps in the subs. Anything in the range of 18 to 24 gauge, or even higher, should do fine, assuming that the main speakers are connected to the amp separately, via heavier gauge cables.

Finally, you might consider adding another acoustic panel, in this case to the wall behind the listening position. The three foot distance to that wall will result, to some degree, in a suckout of frequencies in the vicinity of 282/3 = 94 Hz. Perhaps reflections from that wall are also contributing to the slight lack of depth which you mentioned.

Good luck. Regards,
-- Al
More to discover