Zu Druids upgraded Vs Essence


How does the upgraded Druid compare with the Essence?

I own a pair of the Druids and have been loving them for a few years. Was wondering if the Essence is worth the leap

Cheers
bonesetter2004
I know some folks used the Firstwatt F1 with the Druids. Will it still be a suitable choice for the Souls? I just ordered a pair and am really hoping NOT to change amps.
Never tried that one. I have tried with my Druids, Definitions, and Essence...Integra Research RDA7 HT amp at 150 watts/channel, Flying Mole monoblocks, Nuforca IA-7 integrated at 50 watts, and a Cayin A-50T 16 - 32 watts. All sounded great in their own respect. The speakers are flexible and are at home with many different wattages and types of amps. Many people have been enjoying low powered tube amps with great results.
213Cobra: That's very cool. The tapered cabinet is interesting as it seems they have given up volume (and bass extension) for the taper. Personally, I did not like how Druids sounded at 60Hz, but I was surprised at how much port loading impacted the sound. So I am intrigued by these new cabinet design (although I still have reservations about the Essence woofer) and would be very interesting to see if it has better bass extension that the druid because it looks like it has less volume.

Gopher: I think if you use F1 for your druids and find them acceptable, then you should be OK with the souls. Personally, in my space I find I need more like 50W to get Druids to play properly. It isn't level, it is ease. I do not think Zu does themselves any favors by claiming they are good matches with flea amplification.
The soul is really tempting. I was never sure the transiency of ribbon and FRD are perfect fit. This is what I'd like, a FRD w/ horn tweet. I'd like to see more reviews. Anyone??
Zanon: Soul gets *more* bass extension from the smaller cabinet than Druid, because of the Griewe model working inside a tapered cabinet. They've also eliminated, in a different way from Essence, the Druid's ultra-sensitivity to the floor-to-base gap when dialing in bass balance. You just set Soul down and roll some signal into them.

As for flea amplification on Zu: It does work. A 2w 45 amp will sound beautiful and be as or more dynamically suitable as any number of other HE Fostex or Lowther-based designs. But 2w are 2w. So the second watt gets you to 104db/w/m -- that doesn't mean you're getting ease and dynamic integrity. A solid 20-25w 845 amp will drive them fine in nearly any practical application, but not all 25w amps have the same apparent drive. A 25w PSET 300B amp will be dynamically less compelling but possibly tonally richer still. In a push-pull amp you might not be happy with less than 40w, but a pair os 15w Quad Classic II sound sublime and alive. Generally in solid state, you'll want more oomph unless the amp has an oversize power supply and lots of headroom for transient clarity. Yet despite the efficiency, a pair of McIntosh MC501s would not be out of place with any Zu speaker. It just depends on the actual behavior relationship between a given power amp and the Zu FRD. Just keep in mind in this case, the Soul's impedance is higher than prior Zu speakers. Up from the Druid's 12 ohms to 16.

Phil