Halcro.
I re-read my last post and realise that it could be misinterpreted. Clarification here...
BT suggests that when accessing speed accuracy with a pivoted arm, the measured performance is inferior to the actual performance. This due to the geometry of a pivoted arm.
Since you have a rig with three different arms, it would be of interest to run three sequential tests to see if there are any measured differences.
If there are, maybe we could infer that the TT-101 is actually better than the readings indicate.
I re-read my last post and realise that it could be misinterpreted. Clarification here...
BT suggests that when accessing speed accuracy with a pivoted arm, the measured performance is inferior to the actual performance. This due to the geometry of a pivoted arm.
Since you have a rig with three different arms, it would be of interest to run three sequential tests to see if there are any measured differences.
If there are, maybe we could infer that the TT-101 is actually better than the readings indicate.