Harbeth vs JM Reynaud


Hoping for some input. I come from a Spendor perspective (my daughter recently inherited my BC-1s) and currently use Spendor s5e's with a Unison Unico hybrid integrated amp. Sound is wonderful. I have seen all the discussions/reviews of Spendor, Harbeth, Stirling, and ATCs, and I am partial to getting the midrange 'right' (the 'BBC' sound). With a 60th birthday coming up, I've been looking into one last speaker upgrade. With all the rave reviews of Harbeth's, I got to spend some time auditioning the Compact 7's, M30.1s and Super HL5's (not the plus). All sounded great but the 30.1's really seemed like something special. I was able to take a pair home for a weeklong audition, and truly fell in love of what these do. So now the problem. I have recently come across a several reviews of JM Reynaud speakers, including some recommendations on this forum as an alternative to Spendor and Harbeth. These really look like possible option for the BBC sound, but there is no opportunity for an audition, and that's a lot of $$ to buy completely unheard. Can anyone provide some thoughts feedback on how the JMR Bliss Silver or the Offrande Supreme's might compare to the Harbeth 30.1s or Super HL5 plus? My living/listening room is 15 x 25 (speakers on short wall), hardwood floors and plaster walls.
ihor
@Ihor...the omega super alnico monitors have been on my radar for a long time. Do keep us posted on how you find them. Vocals and acoustic instrumental music in particular. Thanks.
I am approaching 50 hrs break-in on them. Even right out of the box, vocals and acoustic instruments (e.g., guitar, mandolin) sound phenomenal - having no previous experience with single full range driver speakers, I am amazed at what these speakers can do. The 'hype' folks post about what these speakers do with vocals, acoustic instrumental music, jazz combos is absolutely dead-on correct.
@Ihor...Thanks. As far as you can recall...how do the Omegas compare to the Harbeth 30.1, Compact7 and SHL5? Especially... in the areas of scale, image size (large and vivid is good), vocal density and fullness? Smooth and non etched top end would be priority too. Thanks again.
I have never heard the Omega's. I did talk to the owner of the company and he informed me they do offer a 30 day home audition. If these speakers sound as good as the Harbeths they are a steal. I believe he told me the speakers in a standard finish sell for 2000.00. The Harbeth 30.1 sell for 5695.00 in the states.
Pc123v: I only was able to audition the 30.1s at home. Compared with the Omegas, they are pretty similar in imaging (both very very good), vocals were also very good and similar with both. The Omegas might be a bit clearer in the vocals/enunciation (better definition/clarity?). Two differences right now (I am still breaking in the Omegas). 1st, even though the Omegas have a much higher efficiency and folks drive them with <10 watt SET amps, with my amp I do have to turn up the volume much more with the Omegas than I recall having to do so with the 30.1s to get a really full sound. One poster on a different forum this might be an issue with a ss amp. 2nd, while things have been improving as break-in proceeds some aspects of the top end are bothering me (but not others in my family?!). When it comes to a snare, cymbals, a high hat, or brushes, things sound thin and almost strident. In contrast, acoustic guitar, mandolin, and banjo sound fantastic. I contacted Louis (owner/designer/builder) at Omega and he said they still need more break in. They do sound better in this area then they did a few days ago, so I am hoping this continues to improve. If I was coming from a different speaker background (Spendor BC-1 and s5e), and not having home auditioned the 30.1s, I probably would not notice the top end as much as apparently only I am doing, and would be completely satisfied at this point in the auditioning.

Taters: This is exactly why I posted my question in the first place. I don't have deep pockets, this is a family-approved 60th birthday present, and will likely be the last speaker purchase for me. So I want to be as completely satisfied as possible with my selection. That said, $5.7K vs $2K is a big deal and not one to be glossed over.

While some posters on other forums have mentioned the potential for getting a different amp (SET) to get the best out of the Omegas, this is not an option for me. Not that I can't do so, but I don't want to. I got great sound with the 30.1 with my current system, and really like my Unison integrated amp. I had wanted that amp for a l;one time and was finally able to get one and have no desire to change unless there is a catastrophic failure in its electronics.