I also have a pair of Triangle Titus XS bought new ~ 1998 for about $500. Still love them. They are similar efficiency to the Silverlines and tend to sound best with tube amps. But they are small sounding compared to my OHM 100 series 3 speakers. I picked those up for $600 used here on Agon a few years back. That was a steal. They are the bomb in my 12X12 listening room running off Bel Canto ref1000m monoblock amps. 100 series 3 (actually 100 series 3 drivers in refurbed pyramid shaped Walsh 2 cabinets)are slightly larger than current OHM 1000s I believe. 1000s are 1 step up from Micro Walshes. Have not heard Microwalshes but I would love to have a pair to try in comparison in that room.
I also listen to a lot of rock even metal electronica and and other modern pop like some rap and R&B in addition to jazz classical, you name it. The OHMs are quite versatile and can do it all extremely well I find. The Triangles and even my other larger Dynaudio monitors tend to sound smallish on a lot of mainly electronic music in particular compared to the OHMs which have a lot of muscle and "meat on the bones" to go along with all the other usual good audio attributes.
Have also heard various Focal speakers and am always impressed. Have never compared price points between OHM and Focal, but I do know the largest OHMs with built in subs go for ~ $10K (OHM F5015s) and Focal cost can run into 6 digits I believe and are physically much larger than any OHM, but I find my OHM F5 series 3, which are similar size as F5015s but have no built in subs, are bigger sounding than I will ever need in any room in my house.
I would say also its probably worth emphasizing that I find my more efficient Triangles sound best with a tube amp whereas the OHMs do best with high power high current SS amps. I find the BC Class D amps to be ideal. So to compare Triangle (maybe SIlverline also which seem more like Triangles electronically on paper) to OHM, different amps are probably needed to bring out the best in each. Choice of amp will likely factor in greatly to determine which speaker sounds better in comparison I would guess.
I run my Triangle Titus XS speakers in my second system currently off the TAD Hibachi monoblocks seen in the lower right corner of my system photo montage. I chose the TADs for more tube amp like performance out of a SS amp. The Triangles tend to sound too lean and thin off the 500w/ch Bel Cantos whereas Dynaudio monitors and OHMs do exceptionally well with the BC amps. The BCs have very high damping factor of 1000 which works particularly well with the OHMs but I believe it is a big reason the more bass challenged Triangles tend to sound too lean with the BCs.
I also listen to a lot of rock even metal electronica and and other modern pop like some rap and R&B in addition to jazz classical, you name it. The OHMs are quite versatile and can do it all extremely well I find. The Triangles and even my other larger Dynaudio monitors tend to sound smallish on a lot of mainly electronic music in particular compared to the OHMs which have a lot of muscle and "meat on the bones" to go along with all the other usual good audio attributes.
Have also heard various Focal speakers and am always impressed. Have never compared price points between OHM and Focal, but I do know the largest OHMs with built in subs go for ~ $10K (OHM F5015s) and Focal cost can run into 6 digits I believe and are physically much larger than any OHM, but I find my OHM F5 series 3, which are similar size as F5015s but have no built in subs, are bigger sounding than I will ever need in any room in my house.
I would say also its probably worth emphasizing that I find my more efficient Triangles sound best with a tube amp whereas the OHMs do best with high power high current SS amps. I find the BC Class D amps to be ideal. So to compare Triangle (maybe SIlverline also which seem more like Triangles electronically on paper) to OHM, different amps are probably needed to bring out the best in each. Choice of amp will likely factor in greatly to determine which speaker sounds better in comparison I would guess.
I run my Triangle Titus XS speakers in my second system currently off the TAD Hibachi monoblocks seen in the lower right corner of my system photo montage. I chose the TADs for more tube amp like performance out of a SS amp. The Triangles tend to sound too lean and thin off the 500w/ch Bel Cantos whereas Dynaudio monitors and OHMs do exceptionally well with the BC amps. The BCs have very high damping factor of 1000 which works particularly well with the OHMs but I believe it is a big reason the more bass challenged Triangles tend to sound too lean with the BCs.