How much difference if the tonearm is mounted 5mm


Closer.
Hi Experts,
It is for a Pole Star UNV-2 Tonearm. I would like to know if there is any affect in sound if I mount the arm 5mm closer than specification. It is on the VPI Aries 2.
For the Pole Star:
Distance between spindle and pivot is 212mm.
Between stylus and pivot is 228mm. Overhang 16mm.
Whole length 305mm.
Thanks,
Calvin
dangcaonguyen
Dear Stringreen: Some tonearms comes ready for the offset angle if you mount it according the manufacturer advise but if you want to change it then sometimes you need to twuist the cartridge to have the right offset angle.
MANY TIMES YOU HAVE TO DO IT BECAUSE YOU NEED THAT THE CARTRIDGE CANTILEVER BE STRAIGHT TO THE PROTRACTOR LINES WHERE SEVERAL TIMES THE CARTRIDGE CANTILEVER IS A LITTLE OFF POSITION WHEN BUILDED BY THE CARTRIDGE MANUFACTURER.

The tonearm/cartridge set up is a extremly critical set up where there is no " land " to even minimum errors/mistakes because fraction of mm. change for the worst the distortions levels and where those distortions happen.

I posted here that for the same cartridge/tonearm set up the difference between Löfgren and Baerwald alignment is less tha0.5mm on overhang staying the offset angle almost the same and if you go to the links I posted you will see in the charts how changes the distortions for both aslignments.

This kind set up permits CERO tolerances if we want minimum distortions. CERO tolerances is almost imposible to achieve  so we have to have extremly care to make this kind of set up everywhere in the " circuit of the set up ".

Regards and enjoy the music,
R.


To ME....a little off means the cartridge goes back to the manufacturer.  I can not condone the lightening of the wallet to the tune of thousands (or even hundreds) of dollars.  I can not accept sloppy manufacturing.  A little off means I cannot trust that cartridge to be what I purchased.
ebm,

You are correct if that is what the final setup actually measures. That the position of his actual arm is 5mm out of the correct spindel to pivot dimensions for the length of his actual arm. 
5mm off is 5mm off!  But what is implied from the beginning of this thread is that there is 5mm difference between the the information given to make this setup and what the actually set became!  One of the two options is right and the other was wrong.  Is it the final position of the arm that is wrong?  The owner of the arm says it sound terrific in its current location.  This location is 5mm off from what was stated for it to be positioned.  Because 'crappy sound'  has not become the outcome of him moving the mounting hole over by this 5mm, then I would say that the spindle to pivot distance number he has been given was incorrect. His is not incorrect to have set up his arm correctly, only incorrect for not using the numbers supplied.  If 'not crappy sound' is what his goal was, then what he did was correct.  If following supplied dimensions  was his goal, the he was wrong.  I would prefer the 'not crappy sound' outcome over the following of supplied dimensions!
regards,
Dear EBM: You can read some information of what I posted.

Now, if in that tonearm set up: overhang, offset angle and pivot to TT center spindle distance belongs exactly to a determinated geometry alignment like Löfgren, Baerwald or whatever then that " crappy " sound will not appears.

In one of my links ( VE calculator. ) I made a comparison between different PTS distance in specific for those 5 mm. The calculator gave us the values for those 3 parameters I name it  ( in both cases. ) and gave us the diagram where we can see the differences in distortion levels and if I remember when all those 3 mparameters are right the distoriton levels are almost the same. So, IMHO no crappy sound.

Regards and enjoy the music,
R.