Many years ago I sold high end equipment and was floored at some of the equipment which got glowing reviews in the rags at the time.
It became clear that the reviewers WERE "under the influence", that is, would give glowing reviews when it was in their best interests or in the best interests of the magazine publishing the review.
Two considerations here, 1) after the review the manufacturer offers the items being reviewed to the reviewer at a huge discount, so they can flip it and make a few bucks and 2) would the magazine print the honest truth about an item when they are receiving so much in the way of advertising dollars from the manufacturer?
It became clear that the reviewers WERE "under the influence", that is, would give glowing reviews when it was in their best interests or in the best interests of the magazine publishing the review.
Two considerations here, 1) after the review the manufacturer offers the items being reviewed to the reviewer at a huge discount, so they can flip it and make a few bucks and 2) would the magazine print the honest truth about an item when they are receiving so much in the way of advertising dollars from the manufacturer?