Namely the thinness?? Bound to vibrate. Why would he persist with these flimsy structures when the audio world indicates inert mass for the driver loading is better? I'm "baffled".
Oh,oh. Obviously touched an open nerve. It's just a simple question. The website indicates mathematical precision for many of the other variable. Is it that the precision elsewhere makes up for flimsy construction?
Does a dipole driver need the same inert baffle as a box design loudspeaker? I don't know, but apparently one of the truly great loudspeaker designers doesn't think so. Why doubt a master?
You must have a verified phone number and physical address in order to post in the Audiogon Forums. Please return to Audiogon.com and complete this step. If you have any questions please contact Support.
