First of all I don’t hate MIT. I sold it for over 6 years of time and I even owned it. The world is already full of hate.
I didn’t say that you should not or never use it. This would be the biggest bullshit. I only said; you need to understand how MIT builds the stage and sound.
Because they only use copper, it will never sound harsh. But beside the sound each cable brand owns it’s properties in how the stage is being build.
When you compared many brands like I did in almost 18 years of time you know how big differences are in stage, individual focus, resolution. diversity in sound, differences in height, timing and dynamics.
This is why you need to understand the properties first before you can use them the right way.
For example in the beginning of 2002 I started to test powercabels. At that time MIT was one of the best in powercables. I was iterested in the properties they added to my set at that time.
I really don’t care what the name of a brand is. For me only the properties are important. They can add or change what you would like.
Audio is all about comparing and testing, this way you learn how the properties in sound and stage are. When you use more different brands you often add more properties to your set.
I started to do blind shootouts with different brands in cables. People preferd it all the time compared to the same set with cables of one brand.
It is my personal opinion that MIT is often used the wrong way. When you are more aware of how music sounds and instruments are projected you will get a different perspective.
I use live music by how I want an audio system to sound like. So I collect properties to create this sound. It makes audio so much more effective.