Similar sound characteractics to MIT cables?

Pc123v, i have never heard MH750 , so I'm unable to give any opinions. This MH750 maybe a branch off the spectral high speed broadband cable series, but I'm guessing only. 
Bo, i agree with you that each cable due to its engineering design have their own characteristics, strength and weaknesses. But you're missing the point here. You are seeking TRU-FI, and I'm seeking to build my own sound base on my preference/taste. The music event doesn't have to be faithfully reproduce in a accurate manner so long as it has the sonic presentation that touch my emotions. Different people interpret music in different ways, what sound to you as inspirional may sound terrible for me. You had successfully influence some clients who may not know what they want or what touch them emotionally. But i know what i want in a musical presentation even if it could sound wrong to you. i.e, usually a pianist would be playing in centerstage, with other instruments backing up because the piano is in the limelight. But i don't like hearing panio in the centrestage, instead i wish the harp would sound more clearly because its music notes are soft and easily get "cover up" due to its locaton at the rear stage.
So MIT cables may not fit your needs but it sure fit mine to a great extent. Unless you tell me audioquest have the same wide, layered big sound as MIT , i wouldn't consider Audioquest or PAD, no matter how precise or the separation of instruments that these brands are able to delineate. Nevertheless i thank you and on behalf on other Agoners too, because you also offered your deep understanding on audioquest cables too. 

@tostadosunidos +1 
@knghifi +1

The problem in audio is that at shows, shops, distributers and at clients sets are incomplete all the time. This has nothing to do with personal taste.

What is missing is not there. These parts are essential for the emotion of music. That is why I use different kind of numbers to explain to people what each part does with your emotion.

Another example; Last years I was in Munic at the Highend show. Most sets were 2 dimensional. This is the quality of audio what people can create these days.

In Munic I asked the people who gave demos if they could tell me the name of an artist? Often they didn’t know. Audio is not about music anymore, but only about selling.

Even when you ask simple questions they can’t answer it  anymore. In 2015 I met many people who were screwed by other shops. Over 10 years audio will be a lot smaller than today.

People who work in audio lost their connection with music and also the passion for audio. This is a sad thing to see. Last year I talked to a person from England and he had the same experience as I have.

How is the knowledge in audio in the US compared to the past?

I am running MIT Oracle 3.5 series Cabled and Oracle PC's on an all Krell system...listening to your favorite music through it would likely make you piss your pants!  Let me put it in Bonese lingo...I make the 3D sound amazing.  Sound is real and you feel and see it..people are amazed at how all the parts put together are more than one.  You can experience true 3D sound only when I put parts together that let you experience real true sound...only my special ears and stereo parts I sell can create this sound!  

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha......I piss my pants!!