When I owned "only" the SP10 Mk2A and the Denon DP80, both in very similar slate plinths, I gave a slight edge to the DP80 and eventually sold the Mk2A. But I agree, the Mk3 surpasses both by a considerable margin. Prior to applying the Krebs mod to my Mk3, I would have said that the L07D was slightly preferred, not that I could hear anything wrong with the Mk3. The two were just different flavors of goodness. The Krebs mod seems to make the Mk3 sound as fluid and open as the L07D with slightly more "drive" than the L07D.
JP, can you amplify on your cryptic comment about the effect of a heavy platter mat? "Drive gain"? I was thinking last night that I wished I could modify my statement that a heavy mat might mess up the servo mechanism. Obviously it's also about the motor and its torque. I thought that the original designers had to match platter inertia with torque and servo action, a triumvirate of factors.
Also, you guys, my concern about a heavy platter mat was not about bearing wear. It was about the possible effect of a very heavy mat on speed accuracy and constancy. See above. I'd give the CU-180 a try on the TT101, based on Halcro's comment, but pigskin too.
JP, can you amplify on your cryptic comment about the effect of a heavy platter mat? "Drive gain"? I was thinking last night that I wished I could modify my statement that a heavy mat might mess up the servo mechanism. Obviously it's also about the motor and its torque. I thought that the original designers had to match platter inertia with torque and servo action, a triumvirate of factors.
Also, you guys, my concern about a heavy platter mat was not about bearing wear. It was about the possible effect of a very heavy mat on speed accuracy and constancy. See above. I'd give the CU-180 a try on the TT101, based on Halcro's comment, but pigskin too.