2. home-theater
  3. 1432250620

Are Klipsch or Usher and Upgrade for Me?

I've been rolling with a 15 year-old HT speaker system consisting of Infinity speakers: CC-3 center, Overture 2 L/R, and RS-3 bookshelves for surrounds. At the moment I'm using an ACI Titan II sub in the HT setup, but it may move to the two-channel system.

I've been considering upgrading. I happen to live near a Crutchfield store (for now) and heard both the Klipsch Reference II series and the new Reference Premier series as well as a PSB setup.

I've also heard great things over the years about Usher Audio's speakers, but it looks like their floorstanders are more than what I'm willing to pay for my HT right now, and the bookshelves might not be up to performing L/R duty in a HT. The Be-616 DMD looks intriguing, though.

I am a tad concerned that the Klipsch will not be a huge upgrade over my Infinity system. The Klipsch setup I'm looking at would be the RC-64 II, RF-7, and whatever the matching bookshelves are.

Any thoughts on whether the Klipsch will be a substantial upgrade over what I have now, and how it would compare to an Usher setup at the same price point? What alternatives should I consider for crystal clear dialog, good off-axis response, neutral and accurate tonality, and capable of easily handling the dynamic range necessary for HT duty?

It has been quite a while since I last posted; I hope you are all doing well and enjoying the hobby!

Best,
HC
aggielaw
willland's avatar
willland
846 posts
 
I think the Klipsch RF-7II/RC-64II combo with the matching RS-62II's will be a huge upgrade for HT(IMO) and can hold it's own with music. Calling this setup dynamic is an understatement. Don't know much about the Ushers. Oh, and the RF-7II speaker system is not of the Best Buy kind(maybe at one time sold at Magnolia though), thank goodness.

Bill
zd542
5,339 posts
 
Before you buy horn speakers, you should spend some time with them. They're not for everyone. If you're not used to them, it may be a difficult transition.
avgoround
287 posts
 
If I could give just only piece of real honest actual sound advice at all, I would probably tend to go with whatever the exact opposite suggested recommendations are by Zd542!!
Can't stress this point emphatically enough, actually. .this from years of careful research and calculated trial and error results, no less. Oh yeah..horns rule!(lol! .no actually you do need try anything first, course) Just messin w yaz! Lol Anyway, maybe that helps . . it does for me
aggielaw OP
267 posts
 
Hmm. Thanks, guys. That's food for thought. One of the reasons I'm looking to upgrade is I need speakers that sound good in a variety of rooms because I move every couple years. For some reason I assumed the horn would have superior horizontal dispersion. If it's inferior to a dome that would give me less flexibility rather than more.

Thanks again!
zd542
5,339 posts
 
"One of the reasons I'm looking to upgrade is I need speakers that sound good in a variety of rooms because I move every couple years. For some reason I assumed the horn would have superior horizontal dispersion. If it's inferior to a dome that would give me less flexibility rather than more."

Its not really better or worse, as much as it is different. Horns just have a sound that not everyone likes. Its not room dependent either. Its no different than any other design. If you like them you can usually make them work, and if you don't no amount of tweaking will make it right.

If you're not sure about horns and you can't afford to take a loss, its worth mentioning that very few audiophiles actually use them. The largest subgroup, by far, are people that are into low output tube amps. They use horns because they're so efficient. Also, those amps are usually rolled off quite a bit in the highs, making horns much more listenable.

That said, you could be part of the group that loves horn speakers. Nothing wrong with that. My only caution would be to make sure before you buy a pair so you don't loose money on a mistake.
More to discover