atmasphere
4,822 posts
05-25-2016 5:29pm
Geoffkait: just to set the record straight, UL is not a requirement or a directive, it’s a guideline or standard.
to which Atmasphere replied,
"I did not state that it was. I did state that the CE mark was a directive, and that there are others. You simply chose to misinterpret, as part of your on-going program to make others wrong."
wiggle, wiggle...
then Atmasphere quoted me here,
Geoffkait: The insinuation that tests that don’t get the "right" results are not honest or careful is rhetoric. His rhetoric. I’ve already pointed out that a scientifically correct test would eliminate the fuse holder altogether.
"Al is not prone to rhetoric. OTOH such seems to be your lifestyle."
What exactly are you insinuating?
atmasphere closed with this comment,
"A scientific test would not eliminate the fuseholder, not if you actually wanted to know what is going on."
You can test the fuse holder separately if you really were interested in arriving at the truth. I realize you and Al are just playing Ivory Tower, and have no interest or plan to test either the fuse or the fuse holder. That’s the difference between a Skeptic and a Sceptic.
Cheerios