atmasphere
4,831 posts
06-01-2016 11:31am
Geoffkait: I hate to judge before all the facts are in but it appears your entire argument hinges on that statement, yet it is strictly hypothetical and specious.
To which Atmasphere replied,
"Not at all. I used the word ’might’ as with some fuseholders and fuses, the voltage drop stays about the same due to the alignment of the contacts. This easily explains why there are inconsistencies in reports."
Inconsistencies in reports? There are not inconsistencies in reports. Most reports are actually consistent.
Geoffkait: I also happen to be rather skeptical that anomalies in pressure or contact surface can actually explain the differences in soundstage, dynamics and tonality among other things that have been reported by many.
Atmasphere also wrote,
"Given your constant trolling, this such should come as no surprise. In your case I suspect its more profitable if the explanation remains mysterious and tricky to explain while using words like ’quantum’."
That makes no sense. The explanation is not mysterious. And I actually have not used the word quantum, at least not in this discussion. Are you afraid of the word quantum? Boo! Profitable? For me? Shirley you jest.
This whole discussion is an excellent illustration of the Backfire Effect, the phenomenon that occurs when someone clings to his original theory despite well constructed counter arguments and evidence to the contrary. The Backfire Effect becomes more and more pronounced as the evidence piles up, such that the person becomes more an more convinced in his mind he must actually be right.
have a nice day,
Geoff Kait
machina dynamica
advanced audio conceits