Jazz for aficionados


Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
Speaking of great flugelhorn players (Farmer), Clark Terry was one of the pioneers on the instrument; one of the very first jazz trumpet players to play it.  Carson was a class act; he loved his band.

Rok's cat; cat scat:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vb3OyIz4I-s

jzzmusician, Willis Jackson:. as you so eloquently said recently: DAMN!!

What a sound; from the gut! Thanks.
Beautiful, together with pretty or soulfull or marvellous and similar expressions is adjective we often use to indicate something that we like. In this sense, often what is considerd beautiful was at the same time considered as 'Good'.
Still, we all must agree that ideal of beauty was different at certain time or place.That notion pehaps can lead us to another problem, which is relativism, as somebody could argue that concept of beauty can not be separated from context of time, historical periods and cultures.
On this pages, when we spoke about the music, we saw two different views, first is a thought that there must be a single rule of 'Beauty' valid for all music who tends to be considered as jazz or 'Good' and second principal that starts with notion that 'beautiful' music is not immutable and that depends on many different influences, but than it may not be called jazz, regarding to some.
So,I am wondering are we trying to distinguish what exactly is jazz music, or what is Beautiful music?
Does that means that all jazz music is 'Good' music?
This is in fact  (pardon my simplification) philosophical question for thousands of years (definition of beautiful and good) but somehow it imposes self here again, because lots of times here there is not any explanation why is something considered as 'good' music and why it is not.
I have said something about my preferences, with few thouhts about 'tone and sound' , but it would be interesting to find out more about the subject from all participants here, if that would not be considered as boring or shallow?
So, gentlemen, the space is all yours, next time when somebody writes a critic thought, would be nice to say why somebody likes or dislikes something. Than perhaps, we could come to a point where we could express our thoughts about aesthetics and ethics and their connection in music and in general.
From a Jazz quotation site.

I think you guys fall in the Wayne Shorter Camp.


  • Wayne Shorter - "Music should not have any mandates. Jazz is not supposed to be something that is required to sound like jazz." [P]
WTF!!!!

The truth of the matter:
  • Jelly Roll Morton - "Jazz music is a style, not compositions; any kind of music may be played in Jazz if one has the knowledge."
What Morton means is, songs like "A closer walk with Thee", "Silent Night"  "Shoo Fly" and Broadway Show Tunes, CAN BE Jazz tunes.  It depends on how they are played.  And since Morton CREATED Jazz, who are we to argue. :)


Wayne's comment is ready made for 'fusion' and other Noise sources.  It's really silly when you think about it.  Esp since without SOUND, there is no music.   How can what music sounds like be irrelevant to the music genre.
I guess he was trying to be profound, or more probable, trying to justify his 'fusion' noise making.

Cheers