You're getting criticism precisely because your process is completely flawed. You don't get it. You heard the speakers in what YOU WOULD CONSIDER to be the best possible of circumstances. That means absolutely nothing and lies at the heart of the issue I have with your so-called "review." The problem is, you have no experience with that room, that equipment, or even the speakers. Nor do you have any basis of comparison to verify what you heard is representative or is in any way accurate. Heck, you could've brought your own speakers into that room and maybe they'd even sound bright, but you have no idea because it's a completely unknown situation. Yet you hold your opinion of what you heard in those completely foreign circumstances as something worthy of potential customers making purchasing decisions. You said, the speakers are "not for long-term (sic) critical listening." That is a damning and definitive statement you have no business making under those circumstances. That you throw in the caveat that people should make their own decisions is irrelevant and besides the point. You're potentially influencing people's purchasing decisions based on a flawed and an unscientific and unreliable situation. I heard the Q7s at length with my music in a treated but strange room with over a hundred thousand dollars of electronics driving them that I was likewise unfamiliar with. But even with all that, I would not presume to have a valid idea of what the speakers sound like because I have no known, reliable, or familiar basis for comparison. I could certainly relate what I heard, but it's just not valid. Far too many unknown variables. And certainly not worthy of telling potential buyers what they actually sound like. That's the difference. You honestly think what you heard is what the speakers actually sound like, and that may or may not be the case. You have no way of knowing, which is what makes this exercise next to useless. And just to be clear, I have no relationship with Magico whatsoever. You could've written your blog about any speaker and I would've said exactly the same thing. I have no doubt that you heard what you heard and are reporting honestly on it, but any audiophile will tell you that the circumstances are at least as important as the equipment you're listening to. Again, sitting in a chair for a limited time in a strange room with unfamiliar equipment and music is not the basis for a review. At best, it is an IMPRESSION that should come with all the caveats and limitations of the inherent conditions. You heard what you heard. Fine. At least recognize the limitations of your experience and don't make definitive or anything like authoritative recommendations based on such a relatively brief and completely un-rigorous review process. If you want to write legit reviews, roll up your sleeves and do the hours of work that it entails. I could easily go to a number of local audio shops and write "reviews" based on my impressions. They just wouldn't be worth much and, worse, could be completely misleading because it's just not a valid process for writing an in-depth and/or comprehensive review. You can keep trying to polish this turd, but it's futile. It speaks for itself. There are no shortcuts to writing a comprehensive and actually useful review.
Magico S1 Mk II - The First Review
- ...
- 27 posts total
- 27 posts total