For me Stereo sounds best as a 2.1 system( left/right speaker and subwoofer system) Home Theater sounds best as a 7.1(left,right,center and surround left/right/center and sub) Mono sounds best as a 3.1 system( left/right/center/sub)
Is Krell onto something?
Krell's latest Pre/Pro (reviewed in this month's Stereophile) features two center channel outputs, joining Magnepan in support of this, in my opinion, superior option for the most crucial (should I say 'all important') channel. An image right in the screen's center, one speaker above, one below, adds a palpable level of realism, and, after all, two (speakers and amps) don't have to work as hard as one.
Any thoughts, other than the standard 'comb filtering' argument, that does not anyway hold up to measurements, or my listening experience.
Any thoughts, other than the standard 'comb filtering' argument, that does not anyway hold up to measurements, or my listening experience.
- ...
- 17 posts total
Ok then if two center speakers were better than one, then wouldn't 4 or more be better than two? How about this formula: simply split the wall at the front of your room into 3rd's, and just cover each 3rd of the wall with a solid array of loudspeakers for each left/center/right channel (using in-wall speakers?)! Then, simply get enought amplifiers to handle all the current demand for each channel, EQ, level match, bass manage, and you should be done. I mean, if more is better, why not go all the way, right?! Ok, we need to get someone with lots of ambition, and time on their hands, to do this experiement, and get back with us! Can I get a show of votes here?! Then we can make this "two centers vs one" point of contention a moot point, once and for all. |
Krell just got awarded the prestigous EISA Award for the S-1200u/S-1500 combo. Audio & Home Theater Awards 2010-2011 | EISA - The European Imaging and Sound Association |
- 17 posts total