I used to think passive preamps were superior to active preamps given right the setup, but
https://youtu.be/HHl8F9amyY4
- ...
- 57 posts total
I am saying this specifically for TVC. I have said this many times and will repeat again. You need to make sure that a TVC should have a MATCHING system. You really need to look into the source voltage, amplifier sensitivity, loudspeaker sensitivity, cables, etc for your system to "come alive" with the TVC. If you have taken good care, then it is really difficult to beat a well made TVC. Years back I heard that the "core" of the TVC also made a difference. From my personal experience I have compared my $1.6K TVC to a $4K active preamp and the preamp went back to the dealer. I have plenty gain in my system and absolutely have no issues with bass or treble. At this point, my speakers go down to only 40Hz. I am looking forward to upgrade to a loudspeaker that goes down to at least 30Hz. I am sure that my TVC can easily handle that. |
You are right dracule, but lets get the "critical matching" in perspective We (most of passive users) are after nirvana, that’s why we persist with passives and get the impedance matching right "makes the sound". Which by the way in 99% of systems is a great impedance match. Except for some tube output sources which have ridiculous high output impedance (more than >1kohm). Or some ClassD amp that are very low input impedance (less than <10kohms). These users usually find something wrong with the sound of passives, and say active preamps are better, oblivious to the fact that they had an impedance mismatch with the passive they used. Cheers George |
- 57 posts total