Component Video cables vs HDMI


Hi all:

I just upgraded to Hi-Def cable TV and the provider gave me a set of component video cables at no extra charge. I've got the box connected and the Hi-Def channels look terrific (Sony Bravia LCD HDTV). Just wondering if anyone feels I would improve the video even greater if I went with an HDMI interconnect instead using of the component video cables?
pdn
The component cables are good for everything up to 1080i, but HDMI is required for 1080p (blu-ray). I think some HD Cable broadcast at 1080p, but I don't know this for a fact. Just get an HDMI from Fry's online. You can get three cables for under $20 most of the time.
The pros of HDMI are 1080p video and digital sound are transferred through the cable. The con is the HDMI connection is slightly fragile and is more prone to damage than other connections. The importance of cable quality increases along with the length of the cable. For cables less than 2 or 3 meters focus on the quality of the connectors. I use three MonoPrice.com (no affiliation) premium HDMI 1 meter cables, Product ID: 3991 @ $5.17 each, in my home theater with very satisfactory results.

Hoever, since you are replacing several video and audio / digital cables with one cable you can still save money with moderately priced HDMI cables.
I have been told that either can surpass the other depending on which the TV was configured for to begin with.

I did not know that component could not reproduce 1080p.

I presume these days it would be hdmi and that component is being phased out - just a guess...
The early high end gear did use component cable for 1080p, before HDMI was around,and adapted for the standard.Vidikron and Faroudja are good examples.It makes you wonder,how many HDMI versions,plus how long will it be around.
When the HDMI cable can be had for less than $10 there is no reason not to get one. You get the convenience of one cable carrying all the video and audio signal. More often than not HDMI video will look better than component video.