Synergistic Red Fuse ...


I installed a SR RED Quantum fuse in my ARC REF-3 preamp a few days ago, replacing an older high end fuse. Uhh ... for a hundred bucks, this little baby is well worth the cost. There was an immediate improvement upon installation, but now that its broken in (yes, no kidding), its quite remarkable. A tightening of the focus, a more solid image, and most important of all for my tastes, a deeper appreciation for the organic sound of the instruments. Damn! ... cellos sound great! Much improved attack on pianos. More humanistic on vocals. Bowed bass goes down forever. Next move? .... I'm doing the entire system with these fuses. One at a time though just to gauge the improvement in each piece of equipment. The REF-75se comes next. I'll report the results as the progression takes place. Stay tuned ...

Any comments from anyone else who has tried these fuses?
128x128oregonpapa
The scary thing is Geffkait’s assertion that its the shielding nature of the casing used for the fuse (use of Graphene in the casing not the internal filament) that delivers results at least makes sense. The problem is it is only a theory with nothing concrete to confirm it. . Nothing I have seen in vendor literature "technobable" or elsewhere confirms this claim. Am I missing something? Geoff, how do you know this is the case?   If it is, you'd think the vendor would say so.  

This is an example of what I think Wolf is talking about when questioning SR's literature.

My views are never locked in stone. New findings can always change them.

I’m glad people think they sound good, but that can be said for many things so alone is not much to go on. I guess not many things promoted on this site can be had for a mere $100 or so. I think that is a lot of the appeal. Its a cheap thing to try on the grand scale of things in these parts. Just like Machina Dynamica. Not so much anywhere else. Its like shopping the Nordstrom budget basement. You never know what great deal you might find. :^)

Value is in the eyes and ears of the listener. YMMV.
 
mapman
13,527 posts
07-27-2016 11:38am
The scary thing is Geffkait’s assertion that its the shielding nature of the casing used for the fuse (use of Graphene in the casing not the internal filament) that delivers results at least makes sense. The problem is it is only a theory with nothing concrete to confirm it. . Nothing I have seen in vendor literature "technobable" or elsewhere confirms this claim. Am I missing something? Geoff, how do you know this is the case? If it is, you'd think the vendor would say so.

Yes, you're missing something, grasshopper. This is just another one of your classic, "Gee Whiz, I've looking all around the Internet but I can't find anything," beauties.

Mapman also offered this,

"This is an example of what I think Wolf is talking about when questioning SR's literature."

Or maybe he's just another all thumbs Googler.

Mapman also opined,

"My views are never locked in stone. New findings can always change them."

They're not locked in stone. They're locked in Jello.

Mapman also philosophized,

"I’m glad people think they sound good, but that can be said for many things so alone is not much to go on. I guess not many things promoted on this site can be had for a mere $100 or so. I think that is a lot of the appeal. Its a cheap thing to try on the grand scale of things in these parts. Just like Machina Dynamica. Not so much anywhere else. Its like shopping the Nordstrom budget basement. You never know what great deal you might find. :^)"

Whatever. What's important is that you're glad.


Unfortunately Geoff just attacks me and clarifies nothing asked.

Just more of the typical pattern of obfuscation.

Its OK.  Most people don't give a rats arse about $100 fuses anyway.

mapman
13,528 posts
07-27-2016 12:00pm
Unfortunately Geoff just attacks me and clarifies nothing asked. Just more of the typical pattern of obfuscation.

I’ve explained it too you many times, grasshopper. You just refuse to listen. Either that or you cannot understand the simplest thing.