Mr. Kait,
We appreciate your latest defense - the good guy bad guy thing, really?
Humorous…but we were hoping for much better.
You stated that you appreciate a good debate. Debates require two or more people so why is it when we direct questions regarding and/or challenging your understanding and approach to audible and inaudible interfering energy, all we ever get in return are idiotic replies such as “straw man arguments” yet no answers of any substance.
My personal opinion is you enjoy debates as long as all questions are fired from your shores hence the carney term “a winner every time”!
Not to be redundant and if anyone is still following this thread, our three questions directed to Mr. Kait are listed on this thread by audiopoint on 07-30-2016 8:53pm:
In closing, we are here to learn. You shoved earthquakes and inaudible frequencies up our rods and we agreed to review, measure your advice and sought out a highly educated seismologist to evaluate both sides of the coin. In turn we directed questions regarding your approach and how you deal with what we have determined to be of higher importance relative to managing resonance formed from vibration i/e Coulomb friction.
We take no pride in winning a debate when there is silence from the opposing side.
Robert