OPPO BDP-103 (NON Darby)


Hey all, (My mistake, I know it’s Darbee, not "Darby.")
I think I’m finally going to break down and buy a player that plays SACD disks. I know there are not all that many SACD titles available but I tried getting back into vinyl and was not all that happy with the $800.00 table I bought. Perhaps when I can afford a $3,00.00 PLUS turntable I will try again.
Anyway, I currently play DSD & FLAC files via thumb drive with my Marantz network player and CDR via a good Yamaha CD player. My amp & pre-amp are Emotiva and current speakers are B&W.
My thought is to buy an OPPO 103 - NON Darbee addition as I do not expect to use it for anything but 2 channel audio.
So, my qiestion is; how does the OPPO BDP-103 perform when playing Hi-Res audio and especially SACD? Does anyone have first hand experience with other players that may be a better choice for what I want in the same price range? I’ve read that the OPPOs tend to do better with Video play back than audio. Is this true?
I appreciate any & all replies!
wcc10

wcc - You'll have to keep your eyes open, like you said.  I don't see any other items in the price range that I could recommend, other than those two.  There is a Rotel RC-1570 up for sale, but I don't know what that is going to sound like.  Based on a brief look, it seems that Rotel has a similar approach to Emotiva, but they use higher quality components (such as capacitors, op amps, etc.).  Hence, the price is somewhat higher as well.  You can see the use of polystyrene caps in the Rotel preamp on the op amp feedback circuits (much better than the metallized caps in the Emotiva).  The Rotel also has much better local power filtering on the op amps (you can see the higher number of electrolytics mounted next to the op amps)  The Rotel may have better resolution than the XSP, or it may be somewhat equal).  It might just be a sideways move, I cannot tell.

The XSP does have one discrete circuit, but this preamp is just littered with tons of op amps all over the place.  Emotiva likes to use the OPA2134 op amp, and this is the primary reason that the Emotiva dac/pre do not have the higher resolution we want.

There are some Brystons for sale, but I have had lackluster results from Bryston.  Either the Brystons are too bright with no body and decay, or the sound is too slow/subdued.  It is all a power supply issue I believe.  There is a Krell KAV-250p that may be okay, but it is not going to have the resolution of the newer KAV-280p.

auxinput - Good info. I did some research on the Rotels before I bought the Emotiva and didn't really like what I heard. I thought it was too sterile or bright. I do like the idea of a Marantz and appreciate their sound. (mostly)
There is an "Audioholics" review of the XSP-1 that, frankly, persuaded me to buy the it. As I stated earlier I was thinking of going with a tube pre-amp. Of course I had never heard the XSP-1 before and sending it back was an option maybe I should have attempted. Live & learn! Well at least I got 1/2 of the equation right with the Gen-3! :-) Thanks for your input and I am going to keep my eyes open!
auinput;
I wondering if you (or anyone else) has experience with Classe CP-50 or CP-65 preamps? I see some input here on Audiogon and it is favorable but I'm wondering if the CP-65 is $700 - $800 better than the CP-50? Not exactly new items but they do get good reviews even if limited. Do you think these might be preamps to consider?
My cousin had an older Classe preamp like that.  I can't remember the actual model number (something like CP-35, 45, or something).  It was very slow and warm compared to Krell/Bryston stuff.  More like a lush warm tube type sound.  I don't know about the CP-50/65.  I have heard the newer Classe stuff is a lot different (like CP-700 / CP-800).
You might also try a Conrad-Johnson PV10 or similar.  Very good sounding, well-made, straightforward.  From your description of Rotel the CJ could be a better way to move forward. 
More to discover