2. analog
  3. 125646-77544

Why do I keep torturing myself with remasters?

I am really beginning to believe these 180 remasters are mixed for a 500.00 system.It seems every one I buy it's either super bright,or has an ass load of bass in all the wrong places.The Bowie i have the soundstage is all wacked out .I have a decent setup but i can't imagine how much more obvious it must be on a serious setup.I can say the Yes fragile I got lately (cut fromt he original tapes) sounds pretty good ,Zeppelin In thru the outdoor Yikes! so bright waste of 25.00 again..... 
128x128oleschool
crazyeddy's avatar
crazyeddy
381 posts
 
I am quite frustrated too, especially at the price point we are now paying for these albums. I find it "hit and miss" with the quality of most of these now.
oleschool's avatar
oleschool OP
722 posts
 
Mostly miss 
geoffkait's avatar
geoffkait
23,365 posts
 
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Remastering has come to be synonymous with overly aggressive dynamic range compression. It’s gotten SO bad, in fact, that remasters that used to be say orange, red, green (Average, Lowest, Highest) are now red, red, red. Forget about it, Jake, it’s Chinatown. Add to that the fact that most CDs are in reverse absolute polarity and what you wind up with is a steaming pile of compost.

playpen
161 posts
 
  What about 40 to 50 year old tape sound deteriorated over all that time?
astro58go
542 posts
 
The cost of original pressings are outrageous. There are some that are quite good. Why do we do this at all????

For me, it is this is what I love.
More to discover