Chadnliz, that one article did seem to contradict most of your assertions with the very same criterion you used to support your assertions.
Lloydc, the one area where the Sharp Elite fell behind all the other competitors was in color rendition. Plasmas as a group did better than LCD/LED's in color rendition.
IMHO, the answer to the OP question is; Yes, LED has caught up to Plasma (at least to plasmas generally still currently available)....but, there are still some differences. Plasma is a better value. Plasma offers better viewing from wider viewing angles. LED is more energy efficient. LED's work better in brighter rooms. LED's come in thinner packages.
For me the value of plasma coupled with the typically more durable screens (Sony gorilla glass LCD's excepted) would be preferable. Other's circumstances might differ, and the alternate choices might be preferable for them.
Lloydc, the one area where the Sharp Elite fell behind all the other competitors was in color rendition. Plasmas as a group did better than LCD/LED's in color rendition.
IMHO, the answer to the OP question is; Yes, LED has caught up to Plasma (at least to plasmas generally still currently available)....but, there are still some differences. Plasma is a better value. Plasma offers better viewing from wider viewing angles. LED is more energy efficient. LED's work better in brighter rooms. LED's come in thinner packages.
For me the value of plasma coupled with the typically more durable screens (Sony gorilla glass LCD's excepted) would be preferable. Other's circumstances might differ, and the alternate choices might be preferable for them.