Must speakers have certain volume to sound convincing ?


Panels have no volume, yet some like them a lot. Horns are, well, horns. Small dynamic speakers never impress me, that's for sure. 
What do you think?
inna
...and then there's the aesthetic approach...;)

Agreed, dl.  Sheer volume/db's and the pursuit of more of it in the final analysis is ultimately silly.  Rock concert levels in your living room or wherever is OK, but isn't what one would normally do, daily....IMHO...

Louder does have certain effects on nuance, but one's perception and processing of what's occurring (or seems to be)....should remain...'stable', still 'perceivable'....hmm, 'uniform'....
I appreciate the 'venue appropriate' thought; chamber music vs. small club jazz vs.*insert your favorite here*.  It's a judgement call as to the appropo, but a nice view to take...
Sounds like your line conditioner was your best investment....although the Thiels' + Classe' sounds like a promising match....

Enjoy.....play loud...;) *L*

I have found that how loud a system needs to be played to be satisfying is not just a matter of the type of speaker or particular models of speakers.  The nature of the amplifier is as important.  I have been at demonstrations where people who are new to tube amplifiers are amazed at how "loud" they sound even though they have a much lower wattage rating than the solid state that it is being compared to.  Some people even talk as if a "tube watt" delivers more volume than a solid state watt.  I don't think so.  I think that, at any given volume a good tube amp sounds more satisfying and engaging that one just thinks it is playing louder.  I don't find better solid state amps to be grainy or harsh or thin or bright (the common accusations leveled at solid state), what I find is that most sound a little lifeless and I tend to lose interest and concentration quicker when I listen to solid state.  In fact, those negative attributes are, to me, much more common to high-powered tube amps than solid state ones.

I have found that, as I have improved my system over the years, I tend to play it at lower and lower volume levels; I don't look at ability to achieve higher volume levels as a major objective.  As to "realistic" sound, I again don't think high volume capability is paramount.  For classical music, even if one could achieve comparable peak volume levels, one would never play the system that way because the quieter parts of the music would be WAY too loud (recordings do not have realistic dynamic range).  For jazz and smaller ensemble music, I actually prefer listening at levels below that of live venues.  I don't really want to reproduce the live experience of a rock concert at home either; that experience is really not about the sound (if my system ever sounded as bad as that of a live concert, I would junk it). 

I have found having a sub helps to find that Magic volume where things sound real, even if not that loud.  

Funny someone mentioned pioneer hpm series.  I used to own the hpm100 as a teenager also.  I eventually rewired that speaker bypassing the tone controls and binding posts and even today a friend has them and they sound fantastic.  Of course no where near my current "pioneers" the Tad cr1.   

Yeah, subs 'liven up' low volumes, even with larger speakers as mains.  Bass comes down to moving lots of n2o2co2ar about, and one can't seem to get it to move enough. *G*