Leaving the Naim game . . .


As you all might guess from my screen name, I've owned Naim for a long time - since 1983, when the first Nait came out.  I've been up and down the range, topping out with the CDS2/52/2x250/SBL active (along with a maxed out LP12).  Lots of boxes!  And it all sounded pretty good - when it was "on," it was was mighty hard to beat.  Life intervened, and I wound up moving back down to much more modest systems, finally selling everything off when I was deployed to Iraq and then Afghanistan. 

When I got back from Afghanistan, I got back to hifi with a fairly basic Linn system, which I enjoyed until this past summer, when I swapped out the Linn gear for a modest Naim setup - the entry level separates.  Over the course of a couple of months, I rapidly ran up the range and wound up with a 202/Hicap/NAPSC/200. 

But.

I wasn't pleased.  It didn't make me want to play CD after CD the way the older Naim gear had.  And the journey had become a chore, rather than the fun it used to be.  I tried different speakers, different sources, etc., and nothing made it quite gel.

So:

Since I'm of reasonable intelligence, I took the proverbial look around.  And tried some different systems - probably the usual suspects for someone with such a strong history with Naim and Linn.  And wound up with a stack of gear from Exposure Hifi - the 3010S2 series.  In many respects, it's better sounding than the Naim gear it replaced.  It's a little clearer sounding (or a bit more detailed, whichever way you prefer), while at the same time providing more body, making a Bosendorfer more easily distinguishable from a Steinway.  It's got a touch more warmth, so you can tell Suzanne Vega, while thin, does indeed have a body and is not just a disembodied mouth.  And it has more grip (at least on the speakers I tried with both systems), which gives the impression of deeper, better controlled bass.  And it actually made more sense of rhythms and timing than the Naim system. 

While I trust my own ears, I played both systems for some friends, and the unanimous preference was for the Exposure.  Which made me curious - the Exposure costs something like 35% of the Naim at retail - what on earth could be going on?  And I think that the core answer is that Naim has changed dramatically since Julian Vereker passed, and especially when they joined Focal and were then acquired by Naxicap, a French investment bank.  It's rather sad to see that some on the Naim forum can't accept that something might sound better and be preferred - one of the aspects I appreciate here. 

Anyway, it's been an interesting journey, and fun to get back to it. 
naimfan
I've heard nothing but great things about Croft.  Heard one probably 20 years ago in the UK and it was great; just not available in the US at the time. 

Glen - I'm not too worried - enjoyed Naim for a long time and would probably still like an olive system.  But the Classic range doesn't seem competitive price-wise; and adding more and more boxes just isn't an option.  And the sound just didn't cut it - the most important part for me was that I wasn't listening every day.  Now I am. 
naimfan-

how did you like the TelluriumQ cabling?
This is on my must- demo list.
The Exposure stuff stands the test of time and is simply great sounding gear. You made a good choice.
@jafant

The TQ Black speaker cable is good.  It sounds better than NACA5 in either the Naim or Exposure system - it's much more "hear-through."  It sounds like it goes deeper at the same time it tidies up the bass, and upper frequencies are noticeably cleaner sounding. 

Great value, I'd love to try the Ultra Black - which is just a *bit* more expensive.