Dylan wins Nobel Prize in Literature

Sarcasm. Is this a rational response to someone's post? Does sarcasm have on it's own merit, a place on these forums as a rational, effective response to any kind of discourse?

Please rate your response to this as:

(1) I agree that sarcasm should be a sufficient response to any post made. Having accepted this form of response, I also agree that this form of response stands as the ultimate definition of what my point is and that I can't make or conceive any other form of another reasonable, rational counterpoint.

(2) I agree that sarcasm should have no place as a response to any post made.

Let the voting begin.

Congrats to Mr. Dylan!

I really don't know whether he deserves it any more this year than someone else, but a group of people in Sweden have declared him worthy.  Frankly, they know more about modern literature than I do and I suspect they know more about that subject than anyone posting on this thread.

Vinyl yes I tettered on adding Armstrong but not sure why I did not. My fault. 

Any one not sure about Dylan or the importance of Johnny Cash should read what Dylan wrote when Cash died. 

http://www.frankgrizzard.info/public_html/cash.html

I met Paul Clayton, Dylan's best friend in the early days in NYC, a singer of Sailing Songs, American music and dulcimer player and whom Dylan mentions in Chronickes, in Charlottesville way back when.