Reclocking device for the Schiit Gungnir?

Erik,

Double agreed!  I had B&W. CM6s2 and listened to the B&W 805 diamonds.  Those were so bright they were like diamonds cutting my eardrums.

upgraded to Aerial 5T. I left that mass spearker brightness forever.

I have the yggy as well and it does not need any reclocker.  I suspect the rest of their line is similar. 

A lot of the discussion on dacs - particularly schiit - is on specs rather than sound. if the chord spunds better why not stay with it? we all agree specs dont correlate exactly to good sound. 

@skoczylas ,

A lot of the discussion on dacs - particularly schiit - is on specs rather than sound. if the chord spunds better why not stay with it? we all agree specs dont correlate exactly to good sound.

That’s true, but there are so many users praising the sonics of the Schiit, even on this forum, that I wanted to try it.
As for the ChordEX, it was very musical, very analogue, but was too forward in presentation for me. Also lacking in low-end and inner detail. It uses a SMPS wall-wart and it’s recommended to upgrade to a linear PS for optimal performance. To add a new power supply would have made it more expensive than the Schiit.

I love the sumptuous presentation of the Gungnir MB. I need to find the cause of the digital edge I’m hearing. I have good advice from the contributors that it could be the cable format, CD transport, or even my speakers. Or maybe it needs longer burn-in?

Excuse me, only one comment about the Schiits was based on spec. I read the specs long after I really liked them.

However, to your own ears be true! :) If it’s too hard for you it’s too hard.

Based on spec and auditioning I think Schiits are source insensitive. If you find it glaring and hard, it's down stream from them, not up.

Best,

Erik

Try the Intona galvonic isolater . 
Alan